|
[Sponsors] |
January 15, 2014, 00:37 |
ANSYS CFX Solver Domain Imbalance
|
#1 |
New Member
Amod Panthee
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Nepal
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 13 |
I am doing CFD analysis of pelton turbine using ANSYS. THe CFX solver shows domain imbalance, attached. My domain consists of a stationary domain and rotary domain. I was looking if anybody could explain the physical meaning of domain imbalance. The value changes from positive value to negative value.
|
|
January 15, 2014, 06:53 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
The domain imbalance is simply the sum of that variable over the domain's boundaries. So for mass, it is the the sum of all the inlets plus the outlets (noting that flow into the domain is positive and out is negative). If conservation is achieved this will sum to zero (assuming no mass sources or sinks, or accumulation of mass in the domain). If it does not sum to zero the imbalance gives you the magnitude of the imbalance and it is up to up to determine if that is a problem or not. This is also done for momentum, heat and any other equations you are using.
The imbalances you are showing are pretty large for most applications so most people would not consider your simulation converged. So best run it longer to reduce the imbalances. Even better, add imbalances to the convergence criteria and it will keep running until the imbalances are down to your defined tolerance. |
|
January 15, 2014, 07:22 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 15 |
In solver control, select "Consvervation Target" and set it to a small value, say 0.01 or anything of your choice (between 1 and 0).
|
|
February 5, 2015, 17:17 |
|
#4 |
Member
Marcel Jay
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Berlin
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 12 |
Thanks for your hint to judge the conservation yourself. But what do you think on this one:
I have a rotating Domain (x-axis), with a cylindrical opening. My residuals and monitor points seem to converge pretty nicely, but the imbalances seem really high. U-Mom is quite low with 1% imbalance whereas W-Mom and V-Mom are between 9% and 11%. I would suspect this to be due to the rotation of the opening and the air in and outflow. Cheers, Marcel |
|
February 5, 2015, 21:37 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Possibly. But it does mean that it is highly likely your simulation is not adequately converged. You might be able to fix it by simply running the simulation longer (I presume this is a steady state or frozen rotor simulation).
|
|
February 6, 2015, 05:28 |
|
#6 |
Member
Marcel Jay
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Berlin
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 12 |
Thank you for your advice. yes it is steady state, but I already run about 300 iterations with auto timestep. don't really know if thats adequate as I'm not too long in the cfd business.
|
|
February 6, 2015, 05:44 |
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Then simply run it longer and watch the imbalances in the solver manager. They should by converging to zero - if so then just run it longer for tighter convergence. If they are still bouncing around consult this FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria
|
|
February 6, 2015, 10:12 |
|
#8 |
Member
Marcel Jay
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Berlin
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 12 |
Thank you, I will try that.
|
|
March 8, 2016, 08:18 |
|
#9 | |
Member
Marcel Jay
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Berlin
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
What I encountered now is hard for me to grasp. The p-Mass-Flow is fluctuating between 100% and -100%, jumping like square function. Hence I was asking myself how it is calculated exactly. Since my userpoints indicate good convergence, I didn't think this behaviour shows bad convergence. |
||
March 8, 2016, 18:55 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
That is why imbalances are not the default convergence option.
Image this: If you have a box with only a single opening, mass conservation tells you that there will be no net mass flow through the opening. But in a numerical simulation there is errors and noise, so there will be a tiny flow caused by numerical noise (let's call the flow rate m). The imbalance calculation is the imbalance divided by the total flow, so that is m/m which is either +1 or -1 depending on the flow direction. And that is why the imbalances flick between 100% and -100%. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FSI simulation in ansys cfx | Arash67.m | CFX | 1 | September 29, 2017 10:52 |
CFX domain comparison | Kiat110616 | CFX | 4 | April 3, 2011 23:43 |
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? | bearcat | CFX | 6 | April 28, 2008 15:08 |
Cancel a domain in CFX solver | Neser25 | CFX | 2 | February 19, 2007 12:19 |
ANSYS to acquire CFX | Fred | Siemens | 0 | February 18, 2003 22:03 |