|
[Sponsors] |
CFX CHT increased mass flow rate for water matters little for outlet air temperature |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 4, 2013, 01:58 |
CFX CHT increased mass flow rate for water matters little for outlet air temperature
|
#1 |
New Member
Nicholas Lee
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
i am doing the conjugate heat transfer simulation using CFX, by using Conservative Interface Flux and Solid timescale fator 100, it can converge normally,
but when i just changed the mass flow rate for inlet water(from 0.15kg/s to 0.3kg/s) with others kept unchanged, the temperature for outlet air hardly changed. any replies will be appreciated greatly. attached is the basic structure. |
|
December 4, 2013, 02:10 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Nicholas Lee
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
ghorrocks have mentioned that the Imbalance should be concerned,
and i have uplowned the imbalance for my model, could any one help me to get through it of ? |
|
December 4, 2013, 07:26 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Have you looked at the flow in the post processor to see what the differences are?
|
|
December 4, 2013, 07:56 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Nicholas Lee
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
actually i have not checking the flow in the CFX-post, for i was just concerning about the outlet temperature for air and cooling water and neglecting others. i will have a check about the flow tomorrow |
||
December 4, 2013, 08:45 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Nicholas Lee
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
am i right? |
||
December 4, 2013, 17:34 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
I do not know the details of what you are modelling so I have no idea what will happen. But I do know that the first thing you should do with any weird result is to look at it in detail with the post processor and try to work out if what you have modelled is real or not, and if real try to understand what is going on.
|
|
December 4, 2013, 19:44 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,873
Rep Power: 33 |
If the solution has converged correctly, and the exterior of the heat exchanger is adiabatic, the following should be true (conservation of energy in steady state):
Change of massFlowInt(Static Enthalpy) between inlet and outlet of stream 1 = Change of massFlowInt(Static Enthalpy) between inlet and outlet of stream 2 That is, whatever energy leaves stream 1 must end on stream 2. Is this the case ? Once that is verified, you must know what is the maximum possible heat transfer rate for this heat exchanger (this is a function of inlet conditions and a thermodynamic restriction based on pure physics). If the previous heat transfer rate is near the maximum, you will only see major changes if you change the mass flow of the critical stream (the one that defines the maximum heat transfer rate). You can check details on a standard heat transfer book, for example Incropera & DeWitt. |
|
December 4, 2013, 21:04 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Nicholas Lee
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
got it.
it is really kind of you, i appreciate it greatly that your replies were so timely and significant. Best regards. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radiation interface | hinca | CFX | 15 | January 26, 2014 18:11 |
how to set BC for compressible flow target mass flow rate | foolboy007 | FLUENT | 1 | April 4, 2012 04:24 |
mass flow rate error | Masood | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2005 01:32 |
Mass flow rate | Neser | CFX | 4 | February 14, 2004 01:27 |
Determine mass flow rate along flow path | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 2 | October 5, 2003 05:47 |