[taram]

Dear all,
I am working on the study of wall treatment for different turbulence models (fluid domain as cyclone separator). This simulation is carrying out flow simulation alone for better understanding. In the above mentioned work, I need to know the effective range of y plus for various turbulence models such as k-epsilon, k-omega, SST and RSM etc. I have searched but I could not get material which gives elaborated details. So, I wish to know the range of y plus has to be used or better if you give me link to come across the same.

Thanks in advance.

[ghorrocks]

SST can handle any y+.
k-e should be >11
k-omega should be <1
RSM should be >11 if using wall functions or anything if automatic.

But the final decision on wall mesh resolution should always be determined by a sensitivity study in your case.

[taram]

Hi Glenn,
Thank you for valuable details. I will check on each turbulence models and do for sensitivity study.

[hamed.majeed]

Hi,
Does these limits change:
1. If flow is internal or external.
2. Using wall functions

Thank you

Regards
Hamed

[ghorrocks]

1. No.
2. If you use wall functions then you need y+>11.

This is all basic application of the wall boundary condition theory. If you read up about the wall boundary condition and understand it then the reason for these answers become obvious.

[cfdmms]

Originally Posted by ghorrocks

SST can handle any y+.
k-e should be >11
k-omega should be <1
RSM should be >11 if using wall functions or anything if automatic.

But the final decision on wall mesh resolution should always be determined by a sensitivity study in your case.

If you kindly explain why these values of yplus is vary over different turbulence models? and what about LES?

Thanks.

[Anna Tian]

Originally Posted by ghorrocks

SST can handle any y+.
k-e should be >11
k-omega should be <1
RSM should be >11 if using wall functions or anything if automatic.

But the final decision on wall mesh resolution should always be determined by a sensitivity study in your case.

Are you sure that k-e should be >11? Does CFX have low reynolds number K-e model like Fluent which likes to have Y+ < 0.2? I thought these two software are almost same at wall treatment for different turbulence modeling.

[Antanas]

Originally Posted by Anna Tian

Are you sure that k-e should be >11? Does CFX have low reynolds number K-e model like Fluent which likes to have Y+ < 0.2? I thought these two software are almost same at wall treatment for different turbulence modeling.

As far as I understand CFX uses scalable wall functions with k-e model. If mesh is too fine near the wall then CFX ignores this region by "mathematically" placing first mesh node at Y+ ~ 11.

[oj.bulmer]

Are you sure that k-e should be >11? Does CFX have low reynolds number K-e model like Fluent which likes to have Y+ < 0.2? I thought these two software are almost same at wall treatment for different turbulence modeling.

In original k-e model, the definition of turbulent lengthscales and eddy viscosity has eps at the denominator. Due to rapid changes to k and eps as we approach wall, and hence in the values of lengthscales and eddy viscosity within the viscous layer, there are stability issues (along with divide by zero etc) hence wall functions are not optional.

But the low Re k-eps models in FLUENT (Launder-Sharma, Yang-Shih etc) all use damping functions and redefined values of eps to regularise the extremities in k and eps near wall and hence integration to the wall is possible with Y+ values less than 1 etc.

There are w based models both in CFX and FLUENT which are which are generally favoured.