|
[Sponsors] |
August 5, 2012, 03:25 |
cf and cp experimental vs numerical
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Hamed Abdul Majeed
Join Date: May 2012
Location: New Orleans, LA, US
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
i have done an analysis of flow over backward facing step. The results behave as follows Here is what I do not understand, the cp results seem ok. But the cf results are diverge drastically. In case of cf the problem lies with wall shear! What do u guys suggest?? |
|
August 5, 2012, 09:38 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Check the definition of CF. There are many different definitions of parameters like this so before you go any further make absolutely sure that you are comparing the correct thing.
|
|
August 5, 2012, 15:18 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Hamed Abdul Majeed
Join Date: May 2012
Location: New Orleans, LA, US
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 14 |
Thnx ghorrocks.
I used wall shear x instead of wall shear and the results are much better. Thank you Regards Hamed |
|
|
|