|
[Sponsors] |
November 11, 2009, 12:10 |
MassFlowAve vs. AreaAve (again, sorry)
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello,
I found plenty of search results explaining the difference between massflowAve and areaAve but I still can't get my head around why these functions give me different velocity averages at a pipe inlet with incompressible flow. If, for velocity, massflowAve = Σ(ρAV)V/ Σ(ρAV) and areaAve= ΣAV/ ΣA why do these give different values when ρ is constant? Feel like I've missed something really obvious here so apologies if it's a stupid question! Thanks |
|
November 19, 2009, 03:21 |
approximate results through surface integrals
|
#2 |
New Member
Tom Potters
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 17 |
I noticed the same thing (in Fluent 6.3.26) and asked Fluent about this. Their response was that they were aware that the surface integral utility produces approximate results and that the right values (at least for some properties) can be obtained through the flux report. I have to admit that this has somewhat improved in Fluent 12, but the result of the integral is still heavily mesh dependent.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX-Post Variables | LKF | CFX | 8 | September 15, 2015 15:33 |
MassflowAve & areaAve in cfx | az_f | CFX | 3 | May 22, 2009 14:40 |
Export AreaAve data at each time step in CFX Post | Kumar | CFX | 2 | August 22, 2007 13:32 |
Distinguish between MassFlow Ave and AreaAve | Badrinath | CFX | 1 | February 15, 2006 00:33 |