|
[Sponsors] |
[ICEM] How to avoid single edges at boundaries in 2D models? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 19, 2012, 06:33 |
How to avoid single edges at boundaries in 2D models?
|
#1 |
New Member
Ivan Fernandez
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello everybody. I am new in ICEM CFD meshing. I have done some tutorials about hexa meshing, and I now I am trying to simulate in Fluent the movement of a fluid in a kind of ring by natural convection (like a thermosiphon).
I have made a 2D model and I have meshed it, by blocking strategy, pre-meshing and conversion to unstructured mesh. The quality of the resulting mesh is good, but I have found a big problem: when I check the mesh to find errors and possible problems, single edges reveal in all the elements of the domain boundary. After this, I have tried meshing simple 2D shapes, as a square. I have created the geometry (4 points, 4 curves and a surface) and I have meshed by using different methods (blocking; surface meshing by Mesh>Compute mesh>Surface mesh only) but the problem of single edges at boundary always returns. How can I avoid it? Thank you very much in advance! |
|
January 19, 2012, 09:40 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Ivan Fernandez
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15 |
Far, the files are now attached. Thanks.
|
|
January 19, 2012, 10:11 |
hi
|
#4 |
Member
|
Hi
you don't need to worry about the single edges this isn't a problem. you can continue with the analysis. Thanks Kiran |
|
January 19, 2012, 10:14 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Ivan Fernandez
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks, Kiran.
|
|
January 19, 2012, 10:41 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
Today I check one of my mesh on 32 and 64 bit systems. On 64 bit system I dont get this problem whereas on32 bit I am getting this problem. I guess this is due to round off error since meshing spacing is smaller than computer round off error.
Last edited by Far; January 19, 2012 at 11:42. |
|
January 19, 2012, 11:11 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Ivan Fernandez
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15 |
Far, I have imported the mesh to Fluent, as Kiran said, and solved a case. Non error or warning message has been shown, and the solution seems valid.
Thank you both. |
|
January 20, 2012, 17:18 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
For a little more explanation...
Single edges is on the list of "Possible Problems". If you were doing a 3D analysis and didn't have any baffles, then single edges would be a concern. But you should expect single edges along all your boundaries for 2D analysis. You should also expect single edges along the edges of baffles in 3D, etc.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
January 21, 2012, 13:14 |
Single - double - multiple...
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
A double edge of a shell element is an edge shared by two shells (normal situation). A triple edge is an edge shared by three shells (like a T-connection), which could be normal if you expected a T-connection or could suggest a problem. Rather than have a special diagnosis for "triple edge", we just have one for "multiple edge", which could be three or more shells meeting at an edge...
By the same logic, a single edge is an edge connected to only a single shell... In practice, it is the perimeter of a 2D or zero thickness shell model. Perfectly acceptable in those circumstances, but potentially a problem if you were trying to form a closed volume so you could fill with delaunay or hexa dominant fills... When the mesh check tells me I have one of these situations, even if I am expecting it, I just ask for the subset. Then I add one or two layers to the subset so I can get an idea of what is going on. You can also right click on shells to have it highlight these single or multiple edges. Either way, don't decide if it is a problem or what to do until you have seen it in context.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
February 18, 2013, 16:54 |
|
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi, Simon!!
Just a simple question... I am trying to mesh a 2D circular cylinder, so you can imagine which my problem is: single edes! also you told single edges is not always a problem (above all in 2D meshes), if I export my bidimensional mesh to fluent without checking, I found an error from fluent when reading. So, could you tell me how to face this problem?? I am sure it has to do a very easy solution as I was getting excellent results from 3D hexa meshes... Best, Antonio |
|
October 16, 2014, 07:00 |
|
#13 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everybody,
i am using icem cfd for 1 year and i am creating my first 3D mesh. My cfd calculation give me an error with that mesh only on some elements. Mesh quality is good for icem but there is a problem with some single edges, these edges and faces are precisely the elements making problems during the computation. I dont' know how to deal with that problem, would you know what to do ? Thanks Jérôme |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Incompressible Turbulence models | achinta | OpenFOAM | 4 | May 27, 2010 11:35 |
Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows | Hansong Tang | Main CFD Forum | 6 | December 8, 2009 04:21 |
Single Bubble | Gerrit Senger | CFX | 4 | March 12, 2007 17:29 |
Different models in a single domain | RANA | FLUENT | 2 | February 15, 2007 10:23 |
P4 1.5 or Dual P3 800EB on Gibabyte board | Danial | FLUENT | 4 | September 12, 2001 12:44 |