|
[Sponsors] |
[ICEM] How To Select Number of Nodes For a Particular Length |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 24, 2016, 03:32 |
How To Select Number of Nodes For a Particular Length
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Dear all,
Hi. Hope are well. I wanted to ask on what basis are the number of nodes selected for a particular length in Edge Params in Pre-Mesh Params? I am using an O-grid for circular double pipe geometry and the length of my pipe is 1 m. In that case what number of nodes should I set for the Edge of "length of pipe". Would be grateful. Thanks. |
|
February 25, 2016, 07:42 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Is there anyone who can help me? Would be grateful. Thanks.
|
|
February 26, 2016, 08:45 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Engel
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 567
Rep Power: 21 |
Hi Shomaz,
there is no recommendation for such kind of problem. You have to test out how many cells are enough to achieve your mesh independent solution. For some special cases even one cell lengthwise could be enough, like laminar couette flows. You might need the following information http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/val.../spatconv.html With regards, Sebastian |
|
February 26, 2016, 12:04 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
I would recommend this
1. No of nodes should be enough to represent the geometry well. You can start with 20 -40 nodes on full circle 2. Make mesh Independence study, but generally speaking flow normal to geometry is more important than the flow along the stream-wise direction, unless you are modelling transition from laminar to turbulent flow. |
|
February 27, 2016, 01:56 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
|
Thank you bluebase. You are absolutely right. I shall check the link too and will test different number of nodes. Thank you Far. Far you said I should start with 20-40 nodes on "full circle". What does that mean? Is that along the length of the pipe or along any other edge? Also why generally flow normal to geometry is more important than flow along stream wise? Also modeling laminar to turbulent flow is important to me. Would be grateful for answers.
|
|
February 27, 2016, 07:29 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
Dear all. Hope all are well. Waiting for reply. Would be grateful for help. Thanks.
|
|
February 29, 2016, 05:58 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Engel
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 567
Rep Power: 21 |
Hi Shomaz,
i think Far means the circumferencial number of nodes. So, 20-40 elements per 360 degree. And the second point, why "flow" is more important normal to the geometry... Well it's good to know some basics on discretization. Let's imangine an example. Think of a parabolic function, plain old f(x)=x^2. Now, take a ruler and try to draw this function only with straight edges. Start with 2 lines only. Then three, four and so on... Do you get the idea? the more lines you can use, the more the functions actually look like the original parabolic function. But just two lines are not enough. The analogy to cfd is, you usually linearize the equations which describing the flow. Those are typically non-linear. So, to have a good representation of the flow you put many "straight lines" where the flow changes rapidly. Or with other words, put many elements where gradients are very high. Where do you expect high gradients in your flow? Where does the flow/velocity/pressure changes rapidly? Search for keywords like "boundary layer flow" in your text books or google. Then you'll probably understand why you should put more cells normal to a wall than you probably require downstream (for laminar flow). Though, in turbulent flows you probably also need many more elements downstream than a laminar flow would require. With regards, Sebastian Last edited by bluebase; March 1, 2016 at 04:13. |
|
February 29, 2016, 06:29 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
|
Thanks a lot Sebastian. Now I know how to select number of nodes along the radial edge of an O grid but how can I select number of nodes for circumference? Is it done using the same Edge Params in Pre-Mesh Params? Would be grateful. Thanks.
|
|
February 29, 2016, 14:04 |
|
#9 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
yes, use edge mesh parameters |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh sticking point | natty_king | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | February 20, 2024 10:12 |
Ansys SIG$ILL error | loth | ANSYS | 3 | December 24, 2015 06:31 |
decomposePar -allRegions | stru | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 2 | August 25, 2015 04:58 |
SigFpe when running ANY application in parallel | Pj. | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | April 23, 2015 15:53 |
decomposePar pointfield | flying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 28 | December 30, 2013 16:05 |