|
[Sponsors] |
August 25, 2015, 07:37 |
Fluent Meshing benefits
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: France
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello everyone,
We bought Fluent and I noticed that there is also the possibility to mesh with Fluent, has this tool any advantage over the standard ANSYS Meshing tool. I wonder if it is possible to reach better mesh than with ANSYS Meshing. Anyone has experience with Fluent Mesh, is it difficult to master? Thanks |
|
August 25, 2015, 08:05 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Javi
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 276
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi djfanf,
Good question. To be honest I haven't used quite a lot Fluent Meshing. However, the meshes I have done using it has been of good quality. From my personal point of view, I would highlight a couple of things: - Give you more control over your cfd mesh in terms of elements and nodes. You have quite tools to diagnostic and improve surface meshes. - The second point, very interesting (I think), is that from ANSYS 16.0 there is a beta version of Native Poly volume mesh generation method. That means you don't need to create a tetra mesh in Ansys Meshing or Fluent Meshing and then convert it to polyhedra in Fluent. So, you can save time. Those would be a couple of points that come to mind now |
|
September 1, 2015, 07:38 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: France
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you for your answer FJSJ,
maybe can someone tell me how hard it is to master FLUENT Meshing in comparision to ANSYS Meshing? I am wondering if it is worth to invest time to learn FLUENT Meshing because generally I am not really happy with the mesh quality I get with ANSYS Meshing. |
|
September 2, 2015, 14:08 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Javi
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 276
Rep Power: 16 |
I agree with Far. I would go for ICEM instead of Fluent Meshing
|
|
September 21, 2015, 07:39 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: France
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks for your answer.
Well I don't think that my company will spend some money for a new meshing software, i will go on meshing with ANSYS Meshing! |
|
October 6, 2015, 10:47 |
|
#7 |
Member
Aniko Rakai
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Geneva
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I've just started to use Fluent Meshing. I realized that it is actually the new version of TGrid, but I have never used that before. So far I quite like it as it is scriptable and you have a broader control than with Ansys Meshing. But I have problems with understanding error messages. Did you finally give it a try? |
|
October 6, 2015, 11:41 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Ansys meshing is for newbie or the people who want to get very quick mesh for some preliminary results. TGrid / ANSYS meshing : It is best for automobile. ICEM CFD : Best for every thing |
||
October 7, 2015, 02:27 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: France
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello,
no, I didn't give a try and won't probably, I just hope that I will convince my company to buy ICEM CFD in a near future |
|
October 15, 2015, 17:00 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 17 |
Fluent Meshing is actually developing very quickly and is a very sophisticated peice of software. This example mesh on Youtube was done a few years ago now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLjJh41iwhM and the workflows and interface have been improved massively since then... |
|
November 20, 2017, 16:51 |
|
#11 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 17 |
||
November 21, 2017, 11:59 |
Meshing for CFD
|
#12 |
New Member
|
Try out Hypermesh or ICEM
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2-way FSI in Ansys CFX 15 | LucasGasparino | CFX | 3 | August 6, 2015 04:17 |
Help me to choose between Ansys Meshing, Fluent Meshing or ICEM ? | pipolaki | ANSYS | 0 | December 6, 2013 09:12 |
[Other] Ansys Meshing vs Ansys ICEM CFD | JuPa | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 5 | September 19, 2012 10:48 |