|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] (Barely) acceptable growth rate |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 3, 2015, 15:04 |
(Barely) acceptable growth rate
|
#1 |
Member
NC
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 11 |
I'm trying to reduce the cell count in my stent model, whose intricate geometry that requires a ridiculously high resolution on the wall. The interested quantities are only on the wall (wall shear stress) and no where else. Since the growth rate has a big impact on the cell count, I wonder how far I can raise it. I know that the best practice is to keep it no higher than than 1.2 (20%), but in my desperation I have raised it to 1.25 in my minimal model (the actual one will be 42 times as large) without much impact on my result. I am tempted to raise it further until I can't without affecting the result.
Is there an absolute limit that I should not cross under any circumstance? If there's a growth rate at which my results will simply lack credibility regardless of my assurance to the contrary, what is it? Thanks. |
|
July 5, 2015, 22:24 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 375
Rep Power: 13 |
This might help
HTML Code:
http://www.computationalfluiddynamics.com.au/tips-tricks-turbulence-part-4-reviewing-how-well-you-have-resolved-the-boundary-layer/ |
|
July 5, 2015, 22:57 |
|
#3 |
Member
NC
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 11 |
Thanks, but my flow is laminar, so the boundary layer is not a concern.
|
|
Tags |
growth rate |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to control the growth rate of the unstructured mesh? | ringtail | Pointwise & Gridgen | 1 | June 16, 2014 09:32 |
Growth rate control in unstructured blocks | Hybrid | Pointwise & Gridgen | 14 | November 8, 2013 12:42 |
Numerical Issues with Mesh Growth rate? | PedFr0 | FLUENT | 0 | September 16, 2013 10:00 |
growth rate of mesh in ICEM | Nick R | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | March 11, 2011 11:53 |
cell growth rate | nirupam | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 17, 2006 07:50 |