|
[Sponsors] |
[ICEM] whats wrong with this mesh?(pic attached) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 30, 2015, 11:37 |
whats wrong with this mesh?(pic attached)
|
#1 |
New Member
zack
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi people
I am learning ICEM and attempted to do ahmed body meshing tutorial. What i got was an absolute disaster on top of the car in terms of mesh. Could you tell me why am i getting this and what i can do to remedy it? Thank you |
|
March 31, 2015, 10:12 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Engel
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 567
Rep Power: 21 |
Hi Zack,
i agree with shereez, more pictures might be needed. From the first picture alone, i suggest you to check all surfaces and faces, as well as its associations in this area. You might redo the associations as intended. With regards, Sebastian |
|
March 31, 2015, 12:47 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29 |
Association problem, 100%. make sure curves are associated with their respective lines. What you can do is cancel all associations. and re-do it. you don't have to generate a new blocking
|
|
March 31, 2015, 18:05 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
Ali is right. Redo the associations. Associate every line to curve and perhaps if that's not good enough associate the face as well. But the geometry of ahmed body is very simple so that just associating every edge to it's curve will be good enough to represent the geometry.
Regards Shereez |
|
April 1, 2015, 14:41 |
|
#7 |
New Member
zack
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 12 |
thank you for your replies
I HAVE found the problem I think and it may not be association. You see the ahmed car body internally is an empty shell thus the inside of the car was giving a distorted mesh,this was due to no block at its left side(where symmetry condition will be applied) If the internal body was removed and then premesh regenrated the mesh was much cleaner(normal looking) Am i correct to remove the mesh from within the body?and with this logic i should ignore the health of the mesh inside the body? Do let me know Thank you |
|
April 1, 2015, 15:32 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Engel
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 567
Rep Power: 21 |
Hi zack,
probably, the inside of the ahmed body is of no interest to you. Hence, it's correct to remove these blocks. It can be a good idea though to not delete those blocks "permanently" in ICEM. That way you can keep the edge relations between neighboring blocks. |
|
April 2, 2015, 02:41 |
|
#9 |
New Member
zack
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 12 |
Status:I am trying to improve the mesh quality now.
Thank you people for your support. This is kind of wierd that even ansys tutorials dont explain much about improving mesh quality Right now I am aiming for determinant 3x3x3 quality >0.5 as my benchmark. please suggest what I can do to improve mesh quality other than increasing the nodes and why the mesh is bad at certain points.(that curved line at rear bottom is particulary persistent) ahmed clean.jpg ahmed rear side.jpg ahmedrearbottom.PNG ahmed11.PNG |
|
April 2, 2015, 10:55 |
|
#10 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Great that you are able to resolve the previous issue. Quality is really a matter of the solver. If you are taking this model to ANSYS Fluent then Orthogonal quality and skew is the most important with a reasonable aspect ratio I believe. I have always found that having a quality of 0.1 and above gives accurate results. However the solution is also dependent on number of mesh elements ( mesh independent solution) and solver settings ( Right turbulence models, viscosity value, and relaxation factors). If you will reach there and find some problems do not hesitate to come back and ask. |
||
Tags |
ahmed body, icem, meshing 3d |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
udf error | srihari | FLUENT | 1 | October 31, 2016 15:18 |
Multiphase Simulation giving wrong results | niazaliahmed | STAR-CCM+ | 2 | June 17, 2011 01:41 |
tank sloshing - getting wrong pressure | enghamed | CFX | 2 | April 26, 2011 23:09 |
CFX problems with supersonic inlet condition - Inlet values in CFX-Post are wrong | jannnesss | CFX | 5 | February 25, 2011 17:24 |
Axi-symmetric case gives wrong answer | pbryant | OpenFOAM Bugs | 1 | February 14, 2011 22:17 |