|
[Sponsors] |
November 7, 2012, 12:04 |
Bug in DM
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
I am working on some youtube tutorials where I want to make the Hexa meshing in ICEM on the gambit meshing tutorial (know as sedan tutorial). I wanted to make the some repairing work in DM on sedan , but I am surprised to see that DM is making more issues, whereas Gambit is perfect. I have also tried in ICEM with no errors.
Any one knows what is the problem with DM? Gambit: Design Modeller: ICEM: |
|
November 7, 2012, 12:09 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
Here you go
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/68746918/sedan.igs See this thread and post #12 (same case in ICEM : tetra + prism) http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ans...d-pl-help.html |
|
November 7, 2012, 14:01 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29 |
OK, may be i have a clue.
The default import option in designmodeler includes "stitch surface" as yes Switching it to no resolves the problem. that is may be due to designmodeler trying to stitch a complex set of surfaces... |
|
November 7, 2012, 14:28 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
|
I mean, can you repair the missing surfaces, sliver faces, short edge and other problems in sedan cad model (I just shared on forum) in DM.
I see more problems as compared to gambit and ICEM in DM |
|
November 7, 2012, 15:41 |
|
#11 |
Super Moderator
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29 |
ok, this is what i've done so far:
i removed some very bad surfaces that were merged to the ones next to them i recreated them using edges: I did a "sew" with a very small tolerance (10e-6 if project was imported in meter) Did the same for the back, noticed that surface is not really what i want, but i think that can i be solved if i used a split and did it in two step instead of one: Last surfce is created so i can perform a fill... of course sew has to be done in each steps there may be a easier way of doing this... hope i can discover it in the future when dealing with other geometries |
|
November 7, 2012, 16:51 |
Questions
|
#13 |
Senior Member
|
Two questions come into mind:
1. Why in first palce DM had the errors, when gambit and ICEM didn't 2. After repairing are you sure that they are original surfaces? |
|
November 7, 2012, 16:57 |
|
#14 |
Super Moderator
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29 |
i don't know how gambit works... because your iges contains surfaces, and since icem cfd is a surface based mesher, it didn't find any difficulty dealing with. DM includes solid and surface, you gave it a hard time maybe ?!
After repairing , the original surfaces are merged and sewed into a new one. sorry for not being clear here it's first and only things it came to my mind |
|
November 7, 2012, 16:59 |
|
#15 |
Senior Member
|
Gambit is solid direct modeller and works on solid as DM. And that IGES was a solid model and ICEM converted it into surfaces by default.
If that model was not solid then DM would have the surfaces only. |
|
November 7, 2012, 17:19 |
|
#18 |
Senior Member
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ercoftac centrifugal pump case study bug, Openfoam 1.6-ext (Floating point exception) | ArianeJasmin | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | April 4, 2012 15:11 |
Serious bug in LES interface | fs82 | OpenFOAM Bugs | 21 | November 16, 2009 09:15 |
On Bug of Fluent 12.0 | lzgwhy | FLUENT | 0 | August 26, 2009 07:41 |
Bug reports | Mattijs Janssens (Mattijs) | OpenFOAM | 0 | January 10, 2005 11:05 |
Forum y2k Bug | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 5, 2000 11:22 |