|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] C or O domain for airfoil analysis? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 27, 2012, 18:01 |
C or O domain for airfoil analysis?
|
#1 |
New Member
laura marimon
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
I am a user of Fluent and CFX tough I have a question..
Do you think (also if possible with references) using a O or a C (an in the tutorials) domain to analyse a 2D airfoil?? Thanks |
|
October 31, 2012, 11:14 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Alessandra
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Can I ask you why the C-mesh is better than the O-mesh in a airfoil with a sharp edge? which are the advantages?
Thank you!! |
|
November 9, 2012, 00:28 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
For O-type grid, the sum of two angles adjacent to the trailing edge is (360-a), where a is the trailing edge angle which is usually very small. Each angle is approximately (180-a/2) which is close to 180. Thus the edge staring from the trailing edge should parallel to the wall (C-type) rather than than perpendicular to the wall (O-type). For blunt trailing edge, "a" is around 90 so that O-type grid can be used.
|
|
Tags |
airfoil mesh, airfoil2d, domain |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interface between fluid domain and porous domain | windhair | CFX | 6 | May 10, 2018 15:26 |
Flat plate analysis in cfx | hamed.majeed | CFX | 14 | February 4, 2015 08:07 |
Acoutic fan analysis | arunraj | CFX | 3 | October 4, 2012 19:54 |
Acoutic fan analysis | arunraj | FLUENT | 0 | October 4, 2012 06:54 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 05:05 |