[nitinbansal184]

PLs help me with Correction of Meshing Quality.

I have tried Everything But Not able to reduce quality below 0.8 or 0.9

Below are attachment of block,geometry and prj file

Thanks

[diamondx]

the minimum quality is 0.7. which is very good. not need worry about it. i don't know why you need a better quality. all i can say is that the blocking strategy used is very good. no other strategy comes in my mind now. if you insist on getting a better quality, play on node spacing. make it smaller, may be it should help...

[nitinbansal184]

Originally Posted by diamondx

the minimum quality is 0.7. which is very good. not need worry about it. i don't know why you need a better quality. all i can say is that the blocking strategy used is very good. no other strategy comes in my mind now. if you insist on getting a better quality, play on node spacing. make it smaller, may be it should help...

Basically I am Going run this model in fluent with K-Omega,translational flow configuration...
I am not able to validate the results..

[cfd seeker]

Originally Posted by nitinbansal184

Basically I am Going run this model in fluent with K-Omega,translational flow configuration...
I am not able to validate the results..

I guess your problem is not due to the quality of mesh. I once used this Transition k-kl-w model to validate results for the flow over aerofoil and I noticed that this model is very sensitive to free stream turbulence parameters and also wall y+. Please check upon these after consulting Fluent's User and Theory guide.