|
[Sponsors] |
[GAMBIT] hybrid mesh generation and compatability |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 4, 2012, 09:03 |
hybrid mesh generation and compatability
|
#1 |
New Member
masood
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
hi . me again
im working on a nozzle plume of a rocket . and i want to generate a mesh like this(farfield area) . but when i use tet/hybrid mesh in gambit the cell size are uniform but i want the cell size to grow (to have less computation) . what should i do ?? 2 . i have used a structured mesh for the nozzle . is it right to use tet/hybrid mesh for the farfield ? i mean is it compatiable ? |
|
July 4, 2012, 09:52 |
|
#3 |
New Member
masood
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
||
July 4, 2012, 09:55 |
|
#4 |
New Member
masood
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
i changed growth rate and max size in tet/hybrid mesh section . but nothing happened . what do these buttons really do ??
|
|
July 5, 2012, 06:43 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
size functions are independant from the meshing schema.
Are you sure you set up a size function? (SGF are located in Tools/size Functions) For decreasing the mesh size I would suggest you the tet/hybrid Type Hexcore schema, instead of tet/hybrid Type Tgrid. Gambit will fill your geometry with a maximum of hexa. And finally yes, you can mesh a volume with hexa, and other volumes with whatever.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Polyhedra and sliding mesh? | rockewan | FLUENT | 5 | December 1, 2018 20:07 |