CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > System Analysis

Energy Spectra calculation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 18, 2023, 14:39
Default Energy Spectra calculation
  #1
New Member
 
Pratik
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
pratik_97 is on a distinguished road
Dear Commmunity,

I have data for the 3D velocity field distribution on 8 files (8 cores) like this (512,512,64). I calculate the energy spectra using this formula, E(k) = |u(k)|**2 + |v(k)|**2 + |w(k)|** 2 parrallelly on 8 cores, and at the end performed summation from all cores and store value for each k in one core.
But when I compare this with the value of the energy spectra that were generated during the simulation using the same formula, they are not exactly the same.
For lower k, the difference is considerable, but as we move towards higher k, the difference is not much higher, but for all k, the value is higher than the original spectra generated from the form code.
Thanks in advance for your help.
pratik_97 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
energy spectra, parallel calculation


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difference between power spectra density and the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum? reespanau Main CFD Forum 0 December 5, 2022 19:04
Calculation of turbulence kinetic energy and dissipation rate Mondal131211 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 1 May 29, 2020 05:17
Energy spectra ywang Main CFD Forum 8 August 12, 2017 07:19
A trouble with Turbulent Kinetic energy calculation agoshmc4u Main CFD Forum 0 February 29, 2012 14:39
Warning 097- AB Siemens 6 November 15, 2004 05:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:23.