CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Unexpected Heat Flux Distribution on Blunted Nose

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 2, 2024, 00:35
Default Unexpected Heat Flux Distribution on Blunted Nose
  #1
New Member
 
Kuan-Lin Chen
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 10
Kuan is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I’m currently calculating the heat flux over the surface of a blunted nose at Mach 1.38. However, I’ve noticed that the maximum heat flux is not occurring at the nose tip (stagnation point), as shown in the attached figure. Does anyone have any suggestions or insights on why this might be happening?

Thanks!

Kuan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg HeatFulx_BluntedNose_and_SimulationConditions.jpg (102.9 KB, 22 views)
Kuan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 25, 2024, 00:30
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Kuan-Lin Chen
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 10
Kuan is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

Regarding the heat flux issue, I initially performed an axisymmetric validation for a blunted cone-flare at Mach 6, and the results matched the experimental data quite well. However, when I applied the same method to other 3D problems, as mentioned in my previous post, I observed that the maximum heat flux was no longer located at the tip of the blunted nose.

I also encountered a similar issue here: https://github.com/su2code/SU2/issues/1063. Based on the suggestions from that thread, I tried iterating with a higher entropy fix value and adjusting the Venkat limiter coefficient, but unfortunately, it didn’t resolve the problem.

Here is the initial version of the input file for this case:
Code:
% ------------- DIRECT, ADJOINT, AND LINEARIZED PROBLEM DEFINITION ------------%
%
% Physical governing equations (EULER, NAVIER_STOKES,RANS
%                               WAVE_EQUATION, HEAT_EQUATION, FEM_ELASTICITY,
%                               POISSON_EQUATION)          
SOLVER= RANS
%
% Specify turbulence model (NONE, SA, SA_NEG, SST)
KIND_TURB_MODEL= SST
% Specify versions/corrections of the SST model (V2003m, V1994m, VORTICITY, KATO_LAUNDER, UQ, SUSTAINING)
SST_OPTIONS= V2003m,VORTICITY,SUSTAINING
FREESTREAM_TURBULENCEINTENSITY= 0.00021
FREESTREAM_TURB2LAMVISCRATIO= 0.001
%
% Mathematical problem (DIRECT, CONTINUOUS_ADJOINT)
MATH_PROBLEM= DIRECT
%
% Restart solution (NO, YES)
RESTART_SOL= YES
% -------------------- COMPRESSIBLE FREE-STREAM DEFINITION --------------------%
%
% Mach number (non-dimensional, based on the free-stream values)
MACH_NUMBER=1.376
%
% Angle of attack (degrees, only for compressible flows)
AOA= 0.0
%
% Side-slip angle (degrees, only for compressible flows)
SIDESLIP_ANGLE= 0.0
%
% Init option to choose between Reynolds (default) or thermodynamics quantities
% for initializing the solution (REYNOLDS, TD_CONDITIONS)
INIT_OPTION= TD_CONDITIONS
%
% Free-stream option to choose between density and temperature (default) for
% initializing the solution (TEMPERATURE_FS, DENSITY_FS)
FREESTREAM_OPTION= TEMPERATURE_FS
%
% Free-stream temperature (288.15 K by default)
FREESTREAM_TEMPERATURE= 222.974
%
% Free-stream pressure (101325.0 N/m^2 by default, only for Euler equations)
FREESTREAM_PRESSURE= 26342.48
%
% ---- IDEAL GAS, POLYTROPIC, VAN DER WAALS AND PENG ROBINSON CONSTANTS -------%
%
% Different gas model (STANDARD_AIR, IDEAL_GAS, VW_GAS, PR_GAS)
FLUID_MODEL= STANDARD_AIR
%
% Ratio of specific heats (1.4 default and the value is hardcoded
%                          for the model STANDARD_AIR)
GAMMA_VALUE= 1.4
%
% Specific gas constant (287.058 J/kg*K default and this value is hardcoded 
%                        for the model STANDARD_AIR)
GAS_CONSTANT= 287.058
% --------------------------- VISCOSITY MODEL ---------------------------------%
%
% Viscosity model (SUTHERLAND, CONSTANT_VISCOSITY).
VISCOSITY_MODEL= SUTHERLAND
%
% Sutherland Viscosity Ref (1.716E-5 default value for AIR SI)
MU_REF= 1.716E-5
%
% Sutherland Temperature Ref (273.15 K default value for AIR SI)
MU_T_REF= 273.15
%
% Sutherland constant (110.4 default value for AIR SI)
SUTHERLAND_CONSTANT= 110.4

% --------------------------- THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY MODEL ----------------------%
%
% Conductivity model (CONSTANT_CONDUCTIVITY, CONSTANT_PRANDTL).
CONDUCTIVITY_MODEL= CONSTANT_PRANDTL
%
% Laminar Prandtl number (0.72 (air), only for CONSTANT_PRANDTL)
PRANDTL_LAM= 0.72
%
% Turbulent Prandtl number (0.9 (air), only for CONSTANT_PRANDTL)
PRANDTL_TURB= 0.90
% ---------------------- REFERENCE VALUE DEFINITION ---------------------------%
%
% Reference origin for moment computation
REF_ORIGIN_MOMENT_X = 0.0
REF_ORIGIN_MOMENT_Y = 0.00
REF_ORIGIN_MOMENT_Z = 0.00
%
% Reference length for pitching, rolling, and yawing non-dimensional moment
REF_LENGTH= 1.1
%
% Reference area for force coefficients (0 implies automatic calculation)
REF_AREA= 0.950331
%
% Compressible flow non-dimensionalization (DIMENSIONAL, FREESTREAM_PRESS_EQ_ONE,
%                              FREESTREAM_VEL_EQ_MACH, FREESTREAM_VEL_EQ_ONE)
REF_DIMENSIONALIZATION= FREESTREAM_VEL_EQ_ONE
% -------------------- BOUNDARY CONDITION DEFINITION --------------------------%
%
% Navier-Stokes wall boundary marker(s) (NONE = no marker)
MARKER_ISOTHERMAL=( Wall, 300.0 )
% Far-field boundary marker(s) (NONE = no marker)
MARKER_FAR= ( Inlet,Outlet )
%
% Marker(s) of the surface to be plotted or designed
MARKER_PLOTTING= ( Wall)
%
% Marker(s) of the surface where the functional (Cd, Cl, etc.) will be evaluated
MARKER_MONITORING= ( Wall)
% ------------- COMMON PARAMETERS DEFINING THE NUMERICAL METHOD ---------------%
%
% Numerical method for spatial gradients (GREEN_GAUSS, WEIGHTED_LEAST_SQUARES)
NUM_METHOD_GRAD= GREEN_GAUSS
%
% Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition of the finest grid
CFL_NUMBER= 1.0
%
% Adaptive CFL number (NO, YES)
CFL_ADAPT= NO
%
% Parameters of the adaptive CFL number (factor down, factor up, CFL min value,
%                                        CFL max value )
CFL_ADAPT_PARAM= ( 0.1, 2.0, 0.1, 10, 0.001 )
%
% Runge-Kutta alpha coefficients
RK_ALPHA_COEFF= ( 0.66667, 0.66667, 1.000000 )
%
% Number of total iterations
ITER= 99999
% ------------------------ LINEAR SOLVER DEFINITION ---------------------------%
%
% Linear solver for the implicit (or discrete adjoint) formulation (BCGSTAB, FGMRES)
LINEAR_SOLVER= FGMRES
%
% Preconditioner of the Krylov linear solver (NONE, JACOBI, LINELET)
LINEAR_SOLVER_PREC= ILU
%
% Min error of the linear solver for the implicit formulation
LINEAR_SOLVER_ERROR= 1E-12
%
% Max number of iterations of the linear solver for the implicit formulation
LINEAR_SOLVER_ITER= 20
% -------------------------- MULTIGRID PARAMETERS -----------------------------%
%
% Multi-Grid Levels (0 = no multi-grid)
MGLEVEL= 0
%
% Multi-grid cycle (V_CYCLE, W_CYCLE, FULLMG_CYCLE)
MGCYCLE= V_CYCLE
%
% Multi-grid pre-smoothing level
MG_PRE_SMOOTH= ( 1, 1, 1, 1 )
%
% Multi-grid post-smoothing level
MG_POST_SMOOTH= ( 0, 0, 0, 0 )
%
% Jacobi implicit smoothing of the correction
MG_CORRECTION_SMOOTH= ( 0, 0, 0, 0 )
%
% Damping factor for the residual restriction
MG_DAMP_RESTRICTION= 0.7
%
% Damping factor for the correction prolongation
MG_DAMP_PROLONGATION= 0.7

% -------------------- FLOW NUMERICAL METHOD DEFINITION -----------------------%
%
% Convective numerical method (JST, LAX-FRIEDRICH, CUSP, ROE, AUSM, HLLC,
%                              TURKEL_PREC, MSW)
CONV_NUM_METHOD_FLOW= ROE
%
ENTROPY_FIX_COEFF= 0.5
%
% Spatial numerical order integration (1ST_ORDER, 2ND_ORDER, 2ND_ORDER_LIMITER)
MUSCL_FLOW= YES
%
% Slope limiter (NONE, VENKATAKRISHNAN, VENKATAKRISHNAN_WANG,
%                BARTH_JESPERSEN, VAN_ALBADA_EDGE)
SLOPE_LIMITER_FLOW= VENKATAKRISHNAN
%
% Coefficient for the Venkat's limiter (upwind scheme). A larger values decrease
%             the extent of limiting, values approaching zero cause
%             lower-order approximation to the solution (0.05 by default)
VENKAT_LIMITER_COEFF= 0.01
%
% Time discretization (RUNGE-KUTTA_EXPLICIT, EULER_IMPLICIT, EULER_EXPLICIT)
TIME_DISCRE_FLOW= EULER_IMPLICIT
% -------------------- TURBULENT NUMERICAL METHOD DEFINITION ------------------%
% Convective numerical method (SCALAR_UPWIND)
CONV_NUM_METHOD_TURB= SCALAR_UPWIND
%
% Monotonic Upwind Scheme for Conservation Laws (TVD) in the turbulence equations.
%           Required for 2nd order upwind schemes (NO, YES)
MUSCL_TURB= NO
%
% Slope limiter (VENKATAKRISHNAN, MINMOD)
SLOPE_LIMITER_TURB= VENKATAKRISHNAN
%
% Time discretization (EULER_IMPLICIT)
TIME_DISCRE_TURB= EULER_IMPLICIT
% --------------------------- CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS --------------------------%
%
% Convergence criteria (CAUCHY, RESIDUAL)
CONV_FIELD= RMS_DISSIPATION
%
% Min value of the residual (log10 of the residual)
CONV_RESIDUAL_MINVAL= -5
%
% Start convergence criteria at iteration number
%CONV_STARTITER= 10
%
% Number of elements to apply the criteria
%CONV_CAUCHY_ELEMS= 100
%
% Epsilon to control the series convergence
%CONV_CAUCHY_EPS= 1E-6
%
Does anyone have any suggestions or insights into why this might be happening?
Thank you in advance!

Kuan
Kuan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Ansys Flunet Calculte the Wall Heat Flux? eddie4160 FLUENT 0 October 24, 2023 23:21
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation MichaelK CFX 12 September 1, 2016 06:15
Heat flux and Heat transfer coefficient sakil2k3 FLUENT 4 July 5, 2015 16:07
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 08:00
Heat Flux at wall in a conjugate heat transfer problem Chander CFX 2 July 9, 2011 23:22


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:23.