|
[Sponsors] |
January 23, 2024, 09:55 |
SU2-NEMO sphere simulation diverges
|
#1 |
New Member
Peter Lysdahl Bęk
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5 |
Hello
I am trying to simulate a sphere at Mach 15 using SU2-NEMO. So far when I run my simulation I get expected results for the first 1200-1300 iteration however afterwards the results seem to diverge (see the attached image). I tried to reduce the Mach number to 10 where the same problems came, however at Mach 5 no problems were present. What I can see from the results, the stagnation region does not grow as expected (the shock does not stay normal to the symmetry axis at higher iterations) which I expect to be the problem. Has anyone had similar problems and if so, how did you solve them? best. Peter Here is my config file --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MACH_NUMBER=15 AOA= 0.0 SIDESLIP_ANGLE= 0.0 FREESTREAM_PRESSURE= 21.96 FREESTREAM_TEMPERATURE= 246.87 FREESTREAM_TEMPERATURE_VE= 246.87 INIT_OPTION=TD_CONDITIONS % ---- NONEQUILIBRIUM GAS, IDEAL GAS, POLYTROPIC, VAN DER WAALS AND PENG ROBINSON CONSTANTS -------% % FLUID_MODEL= SU2_NONEQ GAS_MODEL= AIR-7 GAS_COMPOSITION= (5E-13, 0.767, 0.23, 0.001, 0.001, 0.000999999999, 5E-13) TRANSPORT_COEFF_MODEL= GUPTA-YOS % -------------------- BOUNDARY CONDITION DEFINITION --------------------------% % MARKER_ISOTHERMAL=(Wall, 300.0) MARKER_FAR=(Inlet) MARKER_OUTLET= (Exit, 21.96)%, symmetry, 21.96) MARKER_SYM= (symmetry) %MARKER_PLOTTING= (Wall) %MARKER_MONITORING= (Wall) % ------------- COMMON PARAMETERS DEFINING THE NUMERICAL METHOD ---------------% % NUM_METHOD_GRAD= WEIGHTED_LEAST_SQUARES CFL_NUMBER= 3.0 ITER= 2500 LINEAR_SOLVER= BCGSTAB LINEAR_SOLVER_ERROR= 1E-6 LINEAR_SOLVER_ITER= 5 % -----------------------------------------------------------------------% % CONV_NUM_METHOD_FLOW= AUSM MUSCL_FLOW= YES SLOPE_LIMITER_FLOW= VENKATAKRISHNAN VENKAT_LIMITER_COEFF= 0.05 TIME_DISCRE_FLOW= EULER_IMPLICIT % --------------------------- CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS --------------------------% % CONV_RESIDUAL_MINVAL= -20 CONV_STARTITER= 10 % ------------------------- INPUT/OUTPUT INFORMATION --------------------------% % MESH_FILENAME= SphereMesh.su2 MESH_FORMAT= SU2 SOLUTION_FILENAME= restart_flow_gy.dat RESTART_FILENAME= restart_flow_gy.dat TABULAR_FORMAT= TECPLOT CONV_FILENAME= convergence VOLUME_FILENAME= soln_volume SURFACE_FILENAME= soln_surface OUTPUT_WRT_FREQ= 100 SCREEN_OUTPUT= (INNER_ITER, RMS_DENSITY_0, RMS_DENSITY_1, RMS_DENSITY_2, RMS_DENSITY_3, RMS_DENSITY_4, RMS_DENSITY_5, RMS_DENSITY_6, RMS_ENERGY, RMS_ENERGY_VE, LIFT, DRAG, TOTAL_HEATFLUX) |
|
January 26, 2024, 19:11 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 676
Rep Power: 21 |
Hi,
Is this the Ma=15 flow over a cylinder from the testcases repository? If yes, was anything changed? |
|
January 29, 2024, 06:25 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Peter Lysdahl Bęk
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5 |
Hello
Yes, I used the testcase repository where I could not find the proper mesh which lead me to create my own. The only parts of the cfg file that should differ would be the CONV_RESIDUAL_MINVAL and OUTPUT_WRT_FREQ |
|
January 29, 2024, 06:35 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 676
Rep Power: 21 |
Hi,
The meshes for the testcases are in a separate repository because of their size: https://github.com/su2code/TestCases Please try with the original mesh and see if that helps. If it does, you can compare the meshes and see where the differences are. |
|
March 6, 2024, 22:29 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Liming Yang
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 3 |
Quote:
|
||
March 8, 2024, 20:24 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Wally Maier
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi,
In the attached image, there is only a wall and farfield boundary condition. |
|
March 14, 2024, 04:44 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Liming Yang
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 3 |
||
Tags |
divergence, hypersonic flow, nemo |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rotorcraft FSI simulation in SU2 | kursatyurt | SU2 | 2 | January 14, 2023 11:20 |
Dynamic FSI with SU2 Compressible Solver and SU2 FEM Solver Diverges when restarted | sangeet | SU2 | 7 | August 3, 2022 02:54 |
SU2 NACA0012 Transitional flow simulation Convergence Issues | morgJ | SU2 | 0 | July 21, 2022 08:42 |
Defrosting Windscreen Simulation diverges and leads to floating point exception | Dehyp | STAR-CCM+ | 9 | March 7, 2017 11:27 |
meshing F1 front wing | Steve | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2003 13:37 |