CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Failing to recreate experimental data - NACA0021

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 19, 2022, 08:35
Default Failing to recreate experimental data - NACA0021
  #1
New Member
 
Philip Agenmonmen
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
PhilipA is on a distinguished road
Hello All,

I’m quite new to SU2 and I have been struggling to recreate experimental data for a NACA0021 airfoil. I have only managed to achieve a maximum lift/drag ratio of 4. However, the data I am trying to recreate has a lift to drag ratio of 23 (at 10° AoA). Link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile...1-aerofoil.pdf. I have based my config file on the Turbulent NACA0012 tutorial code. Link: https://su2code.github.io/tutorials/...lent_NACA0012/.

Here's a list of things I have tried so far:
  • Changing initial velocity to 50 m/s
  • Changing CFL to 50
  • SA & SST Turbulence model
  • FDS & Roe convective numerical methods
  • Looking through the config file and the guidelines in the SU2 documentation
  • Checked that my CV Face Area aspect ratio was not too high (recommendation from this forum post. Link: Experimental values not matching SU2 values)
  • Altering the mesh to be 500 chord lengths away from the airfoil (according to NASA’s guidelines for the NACA0012 Validation. Link: https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/naca0012_val.html) -
    • Note: This was with an INC_RANS solver, SA turbulence model & FDS convective numerical method
    • Improved lift/drag ratio from 3.13 → 4.0 (max I’ve been able to achieve)
    • Also it took 3 hours to run 28 iterations due to the size of the mesh

I’ve attached my config file, mesh & an image of the mesh quality generated (I could not attach the 500c mesh as it was too big)
  • NACA-0021 is the default mesh I use (~7-8c farfield distance)


I’m thinking it is something to do with my configuration settings, however I’m not sure what it could be.

Any help would be greatly appreciated,

Thanks

Philip
Attached Images
File Type: png Screenshot 2022-12-19 at 12.34.39.png (34.4 KB, 10 views)
Attached Files
File Type: zip SU2-files.zip (37.6 KB, 4 views)
PhilipA is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2023, 11:57
Default Potential Source of issue
  #2
New Member
 
Philip Agenmonmen
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
PhilipA is on a distinguished road
I believe I may have found a potential source of the issue.

It seems that joining the airfoil up with normal lines is creating a jagged profile so I have tried to create an airfoil using multiple different curve types (B-spline, Spline and Bezier). However, the mesh does not recognise the airfoil boundary when I use these curves. Here is the script used (Bezier curve):

//+
Point(1) = {1.0, 0.00221, 0, 1.0};
//+
Point(2) = {0.95, 0.01412, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(3) = {0.90, 0.02534, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(4) = {0.8, 0.04591, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(5) = {0.7, 0.06412, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(6) = {0.6, 0.07986, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(7) = {0.5, 0.09265, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(8) = {0.4, 0.10156, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(9) = {0.3, 0.10504, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(10) = {0.25, 0.10397, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(11) = {0.2, 0.1004, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(12) = {0.15, 0.09354, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(13) = {0.1, 0.08195, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(14) = {0.075, 0.0735, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(15) = {0.05, 0.06221, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(16) = {0.025, 0.04576, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(17) = {0.0125, 0.03315, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(18) = {0, 0, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(19) = {0.0125, -0.03315, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(20) = {0.025, -0.04576, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(21) = {0.05, -0.06221, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(22) = {0.075, -0.0735, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(23) = {0.1, -0.08195, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(24) = {0.15, -0.09354, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(25) = {0.2, -0.1004, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(26) = {0.25, -0.10397, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(27) = {0.3, -0.10504, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(28) = {0.4, -0.10156, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(29) = {0.5, -0.09265, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(30) = {0.6, -0.07986, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(31) = {0.7, -0.06412, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(32) = {0.8, -0.04591, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(33) = {0.9, -0.02534, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(34) = {0.95, -0.01412, -0, 1.0};
//+
Point(35) = {2.5, 50, 0, 1.0};
//+
Point(36) = {2.5, -50, 0, 1.0};
//+
Point(37) = {2.8, 0, 0, 1.0};
//+
Circle(34) = {35, 37, 36};
//+
Point(38) = {50, 50, 0, 1.0};
//+
Point(39) = {50, -50, 0, 1.0};
//+
Line(35) = {35, 38};
//+
Line(36) = {38, 39};
//+
Bezier(37) = {1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 1};
//+
Line(38) = {36, 39};
//+
Physical Curve("farfield", 39) = {34, 35, 36, 38};
//+
Physical Curve("airfoil", 40) = {37};
//+
Curve Loop(1) = {35, 36, -38, -34};
//+
Curve Loop(2) = {37};
//+
Plane Surface(1) = {1, 2};

I'll also attach an image of the mesh going through the airfoil

Any help would be much appreciated!
Attached Images
File Type: png Screenshot 2023-01-06 at 15.56.30.png (20.0 KB, 10 views)

Last edited by PhilipA; January 6, 2023 at 12:14. Reason: Visual changes
PhilipA is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[OpenFOAM] How to get the coordinates of velocity data at all cells and at all times vidyadhar ParaView 9 May 20, 2020 21:06
Computed Pressure Drop is lower than experimental data Ash Kot FLUENT 2 May 17, 2017 10:41
UDF for Mapping 3D Experimental Data (Heat Generation) to Mesh jbo214 Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 1 May 15, 2017 16:47
[General] 2 datas on one plot Akuji ParaView 46 December 1, 2013 15:06
studying a valve case mina.basta OpenFOAM 33 August 30, 2013 05:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57.