|
[Sponsors] |
October 26, 2021, 13:03 |
Surface Sensitivity Vectors
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi,
I want to know what do +/- regions in the adjoint surface sensitivity map signify in terms of normal surface displacement. Would normal displacement of the positive regions, outwards, and negative region, inwards, result in an increase in the objective function? Or is it other way round? I have attached the surface sensitivity map of Onera M6 test case with drag as the objective function and displacement in the +z direction. Looking at the extremities of the sensitivity map as well as the direction of the resultant vectors, drag increases when - the positive region is normally displaced inwards and the negative region, outwards. This is the opposite of what I had stated previously. I am confused about the sign convention and would appreciate your inputs. Thanks! PS: I have used uniform vectors only for the purpose of visualizing the directions. |
|
October 27, 2021, 17:39 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 466
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
If you were to move the surface along the direction pointed by the arrow the objective function should increase. |
|
November 1, 2021, 07:22 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 6 |
Thanks Pedro! I was curious to see how it worked and therefore deformed the FFD box, and the results are in line with what you said.
I am trying to generate a similar surface sensitivity map for a propeller blade with thrust (Force-x) as the objective function. The direction of flow is in the +x direction and thus, the thrust is produced in the -x direction. The Cfx from the force breakdown file is negative as well. So, if I want to perform an adjoint sensitivity analysis for Force-x (Thrust) which is in the -x direction in my case, would it be appropriate to change the signs of all the resulting adjoint variables, sensitivities, and gradients from positive to negative? Last edited by Daaman; November 1, 2021 at 09:53. |
|
May 12, 2022, 03:58 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
California
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sHM doesn't add layers to any surface | Vinzmann | Mesh Generation & Pre-Processing | 0 | March 23, 2021 06:02 |
gmshToFoam error | erkampasha | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 22, 2021 14:52 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh generates not planar surface | krzychu111 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | April 23, 2020 17:38 |
[Gmsh] Problem with Gmsh | nishant_hull | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 23 | August 5, 2015 03:09 |
Morphing deforming surface mesh depend on some sensitivity field | sponiar | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | August 12, 2008 14:32 |