|
[Sponsors] |
Different upper and lower bound for different design variables for shape optimization |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 14, 2020, 17:27 |
Different upper and lower bound for different design variables for shape optimization
|
#1 |
New Member
Bikalpa Bomjan Gurung
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi everyone,
I am trying to run optimization of delta wing Micro Air Vehicle having root chord 100mm and tip chord 1mm. My thickness are also decreasing similarly in a span-wise direction. I want to give the upper and lower bound for optimization (movement limited to z-direction ) corresponding to 5% of the local chord. This value ranges from 5mm at the root to 0.05 mm tip. Currently, SU2, takes a single variable as Upper or Lower bound input and applies the same for all cross-section/ design variable. Is there any way to define, different upper and lower bound at different spanwise locations for shape optimization? Thank you regards Bikalpa |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
airfoil optimization with multiple DV_MARKER (su2 6.0.0) | bornax | SU2 Shape Design | 4 | July 25, 2022 21:56 |
SU2 violates the lower bound of the FFD design variables | cfdjetman | SU2 | 4 | October 2, 2019 17:15 |
Inverse Design Optimization | khavart | SU2 Shape Design | 0 | June 20, 2019 04:37 |
ANSYS: Design of Experiments and Optimization - Upper and Lower Bounds | mrswordf1sh | ANSYS | 0 | April 5, 2018 08:33 |
Prevent intersection of upper and lower side of airfoil | beatlejuice | SU2 Shape Design | 1 | March 6, 2017 10:49 |