|
[Sponsors] |
October 8, 2020, 11:58 |
3D mesh scramjet inlet
|
#1 |
New Member
William Haigh
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi all,
I have done a 3D mesh on Gmsh of a scramjet inlet. The inlet Mach number is 5.1. I am in the process of writing the configuration file. Do you have any advice on configuration options to choose for this particular problem (3D, multigrid?, supersonic, compressible)? Any input will be extremely valuable! Thanks!! |
|
October 19, 2020, 12:53 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Wally Maier
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi William,
Thanks for your post! This can be tricky getting things to converge, especially once you get to higher Mach numbers. I would stay away from Multigrid to start (can be finnicky). The type of simulation you run (Euler/NS/RANS) will help define your boundary conditions. If you still need more indepth help, Id be happy to walk though some options you have. If so, could you post your mesh/screen shot of your mesh. Best, Wally |
|
Tags |
compressible flow, mesh 3d |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GeometricField -> mesh() Function | Tobi | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 10 | November 19, 2020 12:33 |
[snappyHexMesh] Snappyhex mesh: poor inlet mesh | Swagga5aur | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | December 3, 2016 17:59 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 10:38 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |