|
[Sponsors] |
May 22, 2020, 01:13 |
skin friction coefficient and y+
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7 |
I think there is a problem with the way SU2 calculates y+ or the skin friction coefficient. The values are not consistent with each other. I am using version 7.0.4
I am looking at the boundary layer of a Mach 6 nozzle. I used the following equation to calculate y+ for compressible flow as found in Viscous Fluid Flow (White): y+ = y*sqrt(rho_inf*cfx/rho_w/2)*U_inf*rho_w/mu_w where cfx is the skin friction coefficient in x as output by SU2. I checked this y+ value with the y+ value that is output by SU2. The values are several orders of magnitude off. I first calculated velocity (U) by multiplying the Mach number by the speed of sound: U = Mach*a a = sqrt(gamma*R*T) where gamma and R are constant I tried again with the velocity calculated by the momentum divided by the density. I got the same result. My contour plots and values of other variables are reasonable and expected. Does SU2 calculate the y+ value differently or is this a bug in the coding? |
|
May 22, 2020, 04:54 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 466
Rep Power: 14 |
This is what the code does:
FrictionVel = sqrt(fabs(WallShearStress)/Density); YPlus[iMarker][iVertex] = WallDistMod*FrictionVel/(Viscosity/Density); Which is equivalent to what you have provided you use rho_inf and U_inf consistently with how the friction coefficient was computed. The reference values SU2 uses are printed in the beginning of the simulation on a large table. |
|
May 22, 2020, 06:36 |
|
#3 |
Member
Akshay Koodly
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 9 |
Just to clarify are you using the "cf_x" as output by SU2 (i.e. x-component of skin friction) or did you calculate the skin friction along the tangential direction to find the new y+ value?
|
|
May 22, 2020, 19:28 |
|
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7 |
I used the x-component of skin friction that SU2 output
|
|
May 25, 2020, 05:27 |
|
#5 |
Member
Akshay Koodly
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 9 |
You should be using the skin friction coefficient tangential to the wall. Using the x component works when the flow is only along x like channels or flat plates. You can perhaps try to use the x-component only for a flat plate to check. In general, the wall shear stress in the y+ formula refers to shear stress along the wall and not only the x-component.
The calculation in SU2 is in the Friction_Forces routine of this file https://github.com/su2code/SU2/blob/.../CNSSolver.cpp |
|
Tags |
skin friction coefficient, y plus |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finding Drag Force from Skin Friction | Rob Wilk | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 8, 2020 07:04 |
how to calculate time averaged skin friction coefficient | adilio | FLUENT | 2 | January 28, 2017 06:00 |
Skin Friction Coefficient Chart Problem | rosorio | FLUENT | 2 | January 27, 2017 17:20 |
why in fluent report the skin friction coefficient is positive | gomnam15010 | FLUENT | 14 | March 19, 2013 02:46 |
the skin friction coefficient error from Fluent | sutthinan | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 28, 2012 14:03 |