[aman_baig]

I know we can define a customized inlet profile using
SPECIFIED_INLET_PROFILE = YES,
and that would work as an alternative to,
MARKER_INLET = ().

But for TurboMachinery applications, we have MARKER_GILES, such that:
MARKER_GILES= (inflow, TOTAL_CONDITIONS_PT, 169623.33, 305.76,, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0,1.0,1.0, outmix, MIXING_OUT, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0,1.0,1.0, inmix, MIXING_IN, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0,1.0, 1.0 outflow, STATIC_PRESSURE, 99741.00, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0,1.0,1.0)

In this case, if I use SPECIFIED_INLET_PROFILE = YES then it will output a sample inlet_example.dat file with NMARK = 0. So I tried this out:

MARKER_INLET=(inflow, 305.76, 169623.33,, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0)
MARKER_GILES= (outmix, MIXING_OUT, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0,1.0,1.0, inmix, MIXING_IN, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0,1.0, 1.0 outflow, STATIC_PRESSURE, 99741.00, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0,1.0,1.0)

This does output a valid inlet_example.dat file but that is not read by SU2 when I give that name in INLET_FILENAME. I don't know how to resolve it.

If someone can suggest something that would be helpful. I want to accommodate a distortion in the inlet profile.

Mesh for the attached config file: https://github.com/su2code/TestCases...l_stage_2D.su2


EDIT:

Surprisingly the same configuration works for a single row case. This must be a SU2 bug.

Single row (mesh):
https://github.com/su2code/TestCases...u2mesh_per.su2

Thanks.