|
[Sponsors] |
April 8, 2019, 19:56 |
SU2 Inviscid Hypersonic Solver Settings
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7 |
After looking online to see if any cases for hypersonic CFD on SU2 I can see that SU2 has the capability to solve problems like these, but have seen no documentation on the suggested solver settings. I am currently trying to run simulations on a body at M=5 for an inviscid test case and have been working off of the inviscid wedge tutorial for M=2 from github. I was wondering if anyone could either point me in the right direction as to a test case that has already been done in SU2 or similar suggested solver settings for this hypersonic case. What I am referring to for solver settings includes the spatial numerical method settings, multigrid vs no multigrid, and the convective numerical method. The ones selected for the wedge problem are seen below.
Code:
% ------------- COMMON PARAMETERS DEFINING THE NUMERICAL METHOD ---------------% % % Numerical method for spatial gradients (GREEN_GAUSS, LEAST_SQUARES, % WEIGHTED_LEAST_SQUARES) NUM_METHOD_GRAD= WEIGHTED_LEAST_SQUARES % % Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition of the finest grid CFL_NUMBER= 5.0 % % Adaptive CFL number (NO, YES) CFL_ADAPT= NO % % Parameters of the adaptive CFL number (factor down, factor up, CFL min value, % CFL max value ) CFL_ADAPT_PARAM= ( 1.5, 0.5, 1.0, 100.0 ) % % Runge-Kutta alpha coefficients RK_ALPHA_COEFF= ( 0.66667, 0.66667, 1.000000 ) % % Number of total iterations EXT_ITER= 1000 % % Linear solver for the implicit formulation (BCGSTAB, FGMRES) LINEAR_SOLVER= BCGSTAB % % Preconditioner of the Krylov linear solver (ILU, JACOBI, LINELET, LU_SGS) LINEAR_SOLVER_PREC= ILU % % Min error of the linear solver for the implicit formulation LINEAR_SOLVER_ERROR= 1E-6 % % Max number of iterations of the linear solver for the implicit formulation LINEAR_SOLVER_ITER= 5 % -------------------------- MULTIGRID PARAMETERS -----------------------------% % % Multi-Grid Levels (0 = no multi-grid) MGLEVEL= 2 % % Multi-grid cycle (V_CYCLE, W_CYCLE, FULLMG_CYCLE) MGCYCLE= V_CYCLE % % Multi-grid pre-smoothing level MG_PRE_SMOOTH= ( 1, 2, 3, 3 ) % % Multi-grid post-smoothing level MG_POST_SMOOTH= ( 0, 0, 0, 0 ) % % Jacobi implicit smoothing of the correction MG_CORRECTION_SMOOTH= ( 0, 0, 0, 0 ) % % Damping factor for the residual restriction MG_DAMP_RESTRICTION= 0.8 % % Damping factor for the correction prolongation MG_DAMP_PROLONGATION= 0.8 % -------------------- FLOW NUMERICAL METHOD DEFINITION -----------------------% % % Convective numerical method (JST, LAX-FRIEDRICH, CUSP, ROE, AUSM, HLLC, % TURKEL_PREC, MSW) CONV_NUM_METHOD_FLOW= HLLC % % Monotonic Upwind Scheme for Conservation Laws (TVD) in the flow equations. % Required for 2nd order upwind schemes (NO, YES) MUSCL_FLOW= YES % % Slope limiter (NONE, VENKATAKRISHNAN, VENKATAKRISHNAN_WANG, % BARTH_JESPERSEN, VAN_ALBADA_EDGE) SLOPE_LIMITER_FLOW= NONE % % Coefficient for the limiter (smooth regions) VENKAT_LIMITER_COEFF= 0.006 % % 2nd and 4th order artificial dissipation coefficients JST_SENSOR_COEFF= ( 0.5, 0.02 ) % % Time discretization (RUNGE-KUTTA_EXPLICIT, EULER_IMPLICIT, EULER_EXPLICIT) TIME_DISCRE_FLOW= EULER_IMPLICIT |
|
April 10, 2019, 12:27 |
|
#2 |
Member
Amit
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 13 |
Have a look at SU2 V6.2.0 test cases-
TestCases/euler/bluntbody/blunt.cfg |
|
April 10, 2019, 12:35 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7 |
Thanks for the help.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3D Windturbine simulation in SU2 | k.vimalakanthan | SU2 | 15 | October 12, 2023 06:53 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Help with element size | sandri_92 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 14 | November 14, 2018 08:54 |
SU2 config file solver settings (Dimensional vs freestream_press_eq_one) | jaiswal | SU2 | 2 | February 13, 2016 11:12 |
Compressible solver in SU2? | Vino | SU2 | 1 | November 26, 2014 21:02 |
Star cd es-ice solver error | ernarasimman | STAR-CD | 2 | September 12, 2014 01:01 |