CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Wind Turbine Simulation using Multiple Reference Frame

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 21, 2018, 09:54
Default Wind Turbine Simulation using Multiple Reference Frame
  #1
New Member
 
Ghifari Adam Faza
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Bandung
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10
fazaghifari is on a distinguished road
Hi all,
I'm totally new to SU2.
I want to analyze torque output from wind turbine. According to some references, this work can be done using multi reference frame with one stationary domain and one rotary domain inside the stationary domain.

Does this case can be done in SU2? Because I didn't see any test case file that similar with this case.

Or this simulation can be done by using only Single Reference Frame like the cardonna-tung test case? Do you have any suggestions?

Thanks in advance
Ghifari
fazaghifari is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 24, 2018, 13:06
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 15
fpalacios is on a distinguished road
My recommendation is to take a look at the TestCases/turbomachinery/centrifugal_stage

Best,
Francisco
fpalacios is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2018, 01:32
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Ghifari Adam Faza
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Bandung
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10
fazaghifari is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by fpalacios View Post
My recommendation is to take a look at the TestCases/turbomachinery/centrifugal_stage

Best,
Francisco
Dear Francisco,

I have take a look at that test case, but I encountered this error when I executed the .cfg file:

Error in "void CConfig::SetConfig_Parsing(char*)":
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARKER_NRBC: invalid option name. Check current SU2 options in config_template.cfg.
MIXING_PROCESS_TYPE: invalid option name. Check current SU2 options in config_template.cfg.
MARKER_MIXINGPLANE: invalid option name. Check current SU2 options in config_template.cfg.
MARKER_TURBO_PERFORMANCE: invalid option name. Check current SU2 options in config_template.cfg.

------------------------------ Error Exit -------------------------------

To solve that problem, I've checked the config_template.cfg and replaced those variables with the variables from config_template.cfg file. But still, It cannot works:

Error in "void CConfig::SetConfig_Parsing(char*)":
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARKER_GILES: must have a number of entries divisible by 9
MARKER_TURBOMACHINERY: must have a number of entries divisible by 2

------------------------------ Error Exit -------------------------------

Best regards,
Ghifari
fazaghifari is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2020, 03:41
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14
koray is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by fazaghifari View Post
Dear Francisco,

I have take a look at that test case, but I encountered this error when I executed the .cfg file:

Error in "void CConfig::SetConfig_Parsing(char*)":
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARKER_NRBC: invalid option name. Check current SU2 options in config_template.cfg.
MIXING_PROCESS_TYPE: invalid option name. Check current SU2 options in config_template.cfg.
MARKER_MIXINGPLANE: invalid option name. Check current SU2 options in config_template.cfg.
MARKER_TURBO_PERFORMANCE: invalid option name. Check current SU2 options in config_template.cfg.

------------------------------ Error Exit -------------------------------

To solve that problem, I've checked the config_template.cfg and replaced those variables with the variables from config_template.cfg file. But still, It cannot works:

Error in "void CConfig::SetConfig_Parsing(char*)":
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARKER_GILES: must have a number of entries divisible by 9
MARKER_TURBOMACHINERY: must have a number of entries divisible by 2

------------------------------ Error Exit -------------------------------

Best regards,
Ghifari
Hi everyone, I've just faced the same error message and found out that the source of the problem was related to the boundary namings in the mesh file.

I had named the boundaries with spacings between names e.g: "R1 Inlet". Later on, when I created the configuration file for SU2, I used the name exactly in that form and that gave me the same error as the one in the previous post. Then, I only removed the spacing in the name and made it "R1Inlet", the problem was solved.

I wanted to share the experience. It might be helpful to someone.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARKER_GILES: must have a number of entries divisible by 9
MARKER_TURBOMACHINERY: must have a number of entries divisible by 2

------------------------------ Error Exit -------------------------------
koray is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
mrf, su2, wind turbine


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays Jeffzda ParaView 30 November 6, 2023 22:00
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 15 November 18, 2020 07:09
Torque of wind turbine simulation caohan FLUENT 8 August 12, 2014 00:01
Single Reference Frame (SRF) or Multiple Reference Frame (MRF) aminem FLUENT 2 June 18, 2014 17:41
Wind Turbine + MRF (Multiple Reference Frame) abolfazl FLUENT 8 May 28, 2013 08:44


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47.