|
[Sponsors] |
March 26, 2017, 04:59 |
Continuous adjoint VS finite differences
|
#1 |
New Member
WANG,Hao
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Xi'an China
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello everyone,
I am evaluating the gradients of draft coefficient with respect to FFD design variables through continuous adjoint Navier-Stokes equations. But I found that the results from continuous adjoint don't agree with the results from finite diferences. I am sure my flow solver has fully converged. Here are my complete configuration file, convergence history of RANS flow solver and adjoint solver, and the comparison between adjoint and finite differences (Yet I have calculated the gradients with respect to only four design variables by finite differences). The step for both cases is 0.001. Could anyone give me some suggestion about that? Thank you sincerely! convergence history of RANS and Adjoint.png opt_crm.txt Comparison of gradients from adjoint and finite difference.png Last edited by Haowang; March 26, 2017 at 22:14. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Discrete vs Continuous Adjoint solution variable: Scaling/normalization issue? | asitav | SU2 | 2 | November 21, 2018 20:11 |
Gradient Computation: finite differences and adjoint method | doan.nak | SU2 | 3 | November 22, 2017 06:37 |
conservative finite differences and finite volumes | Joachim | Main CFD Forum | 7 | January 23, 2014 17:32 |
Inaccurate gradient results from continuous Adjoint method | Yminjo | SU2 | 1 | January 11, 2014 23:08 |
Question about Continuous Adjoint Method | fumiya | Main CFD Forum | 6 | November 1, 2011 11:09 |