Simulating a 2D turbine as an actuator disk

tarikdzanic · November 14, 2016, 20:44

I'm trying to simulate a 2D axisymmetric wind turbine duct with a pressure drop along the turbine using the actuator disk boundary condition. However, running the analysis immediately gives an error that SU2 has diverged. Changing the boundary condition to a wall allows the solver to run smoothly.

The mesh was made in Pointwise by making a connector to represent the turbine and setting one side to disk_in and the other side to disk_out. I've tried many different combinations of the settings for the actuator disk boundary condition, but none seem to work.

Could someone further explain the actuator disk boundary condition? What do the rotation angles mean? Is this boundary condition usable for a 2D compressible mesh? Do root and tip radius mean the inner and outer radius of the disk? Are there other ways to model momentum sinks?

NJB · March 10, 2017, 14:47

Hi,
I've been working with the actuator disk feature of the last few months (I apologize if this reply comes late). I've found that you cannot use a 2d approach, it must be 3d. When using 2d, the actuator disk doesn't "turn on", flow just goes through as if the disk were not present.

If the solution diverges, it is likely a mesh/configuration file issue unrelated to the actuator disk setting. If you look at the configuration template, there are a number of actuator disk commands, but some important ones are 'ACTDISK_DOUBLE_SURFACE'. If you've already split the surface (sounds like you have), then set this to 'YES'. Otherwise specify 'NO' and use the ACTDISK_SU2_DEF command (set to 'YES') and SU2 will create a back side. There is an example configuration file in TestCases/rans/propeller, but it does not mention these options. I think SU2 automatically assumes the disk needs to be split.

I haven't had to mess with rotation angles and other features, those may not be the problem.

Good luck,
Nat

bornax · March 27, 2019, 11:52

Hi all,

do you know if now is it possible to use a 2D actuator disk condition over a line? If this is not possible, do you know from where it is convenient to start in the code to implement it?

Thanks,

Andrea

Umuteng · February 1, 2021, 15:22

anyone, is it still not possible to use pressure jump boundary condition on line (for 2D cases)

November 14, 2016, 20:44	Simulating a 2D turbine as an actuator disk	#1
tarikdzanic New Member Tarik Dzanic Join Date: Nov 2016 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0	I'm trying to simulate a 2D axisymmetric wind turbine duct with a pressure drop along the turbine using the actuator disk boundary condition. However, running the analysis immediately gives an error that SU2 has diverged. Changing the boundary condition to a wall allows the solver to run smoothly. The mesh was made in Pointwise by making a connector to represent the turbine and setting one side to disk_in and the other side to disk_out. I've tried many different combinations of the settings for the actuator disk boundary condition, but none seem to work. Could someone further explain the actuator disk boundary condition? What do the rotation angles mean? Is this boundary condition usable for a 2D compressible mesh? Do root and tip radius mean the inner and outer radius of the disk? Are there other ways to model momentum sinks?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Simulating a turbine rotatory with 6dof	jealor	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	0	October 23, 2016 07:40
Negative moment while simulating wind turbine	angawi	STAR-CCM+	4	October 19, 2016 10:33
please help in simulating a wind turbine blade in 6 DOF ????....	usman naseer	Main CFD Forum	2	March 10, 2016 03:53
[ICEM] simulating a vertical axis wind turbine	mohsen razavi	ANSYS Meshing & Geometry	1	February 25, 2015 13:01
simulating a wind turbine	s.q	FLUENT	1	October 17, 2013 09:11

March 10, 2017, 14:47		#2
NJB New Member Nat Blaesser Join Date: Mar 2017 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0	Hi, I've been working with the actuator disk feature of the last few months (I apologize if this reply comes late). I've found that you cannot use a 2d approach, it must be 3d. When using 2d, the actuator disk doesn't "turn on", flow just goes through as if the disk were not present. If the solution diverges, it is likely a mesh/configuration file issue unrelated to the actuator disk setting. If you look at the configuration template, there are a number of actuator disk commands, but some important ones are 'ACTDISK_DOUBLE_SURFACE'. If you've already split the surface (sounds like you have), then set this to 'YES'. Otherwise specify 'NO' and use the ACTDISK_SU2_DEF command (set to 'YES') and SU2 will create a back side. There is an example configuration file in TestCases/rans/propeller, but it does not mention these options. I think SU2 automatically assumes the disk needs to be split. I haven't had to mess with rotation angles and other features, those may not be the problem. Good luck, Nat

March 27, 2019, 11:52		#3
bornax New Member Andrea Bornaccioni Join Date: Mar 2018 Location: Rome Posts: 10 Rep Power: 8	Hi all, do you know if now is it possible to use a 2D actuator disk condition over a line? If this is not possible, do you know from where it is convenient to start in the code to implement it? Thanks, Andrea

February 1, 2021, 15:22		#4
Umuteng Member Umut Can Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 42 Rep Power: 14	anyone, is it still not possible to use pressure jump boundary condition on line (for 2D cases)