|
[Sponsors] |
June 28, 2016, 11:47 |
Poor convergence in Continuous Adjoint
|
#1 |
New Member
Tim
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am running a transonic case of a arbitrary body in a transonic flow to try and reduce the drag. The direct N-S (w/ SA) equations are solved fairly well, with residuals dropping to at least 10^-6. I have tried multiple numerical schemes to compare convergence rates and accuracy for the N-S. (All schemes compare well with one another)
The grid was built in pointwise with a structured surface mesh and TREX was used to build the grid in the BL. First point off the wall has y+ under 1.0. Stretching ratio of 1.2. ~10 million cells (5 million are hex). This grid has had good results in other solvers. When I switch to the Cont. Adjoint, I get poor convergence and varying numerical scheme and CFL does not seem to improve the convergence. Has anyone had a similar problem? Any advice? My config and residuals history is attached. (Note: This case was a restart, I raised the number of linear solver iterations) |
|
Tags |
adjoint, convergence, su2 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problems launching adjoint | max_ | SU2 | 2 | March 12, 2016 12:32 |
Inaccurate gradient results from continuous Adjoint method | Yminjo | SU2 | 1 | January 11, 2014 23:08 |
Status of continuous RANS adjoint | praveen | SU2 | 1 | April 11, 2013 14:12 |
Question about Continuous Adjoint Method | fumiya | Main CFD Forum | 6 | November 1, 2011 11:09 |
Collaboration on continuous adjoint design optimiz | Carlos Lozano | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 4, 2008 05:13 |