CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Accuracy Issues and Divergence

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 2, 2016, 14:45
Default Accuracy Issues and Divergence
  #1
New Member
 
Max
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11
maximus23 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am new to CFD and I am starting off with some 2D test cases. The simulation is of a 1 meter NACA 2412 airfoil at 0 degress angle of attack with a velocity of 30 m/s in a viscous flow. I have set the flow to incompressible and ran four simulations with Roe and JST solvers and SA and SST turbulence models. The results where fairly consistent but all had lift lower than experimental data and drag higher than experimental data.

I refined the mesh by increasing the number of elements along the airfoil curve as well as reducing the first boundary layer cell height and increasing the total inflation layer height. I repeated the four runs above but JST diverged almost instantly and only one of the turbulence models converged when using Roe, which yielded almost identical results to the coarser mesh.

I created another mesh, this one using a blocking strategy, and reran the simulations again. Now, for all of the solvers it says that SU2 has diverged before a single iteration.

I have modified the CFL number with no results and have the configuration file set up almost identical to the airfoil test cases provided with SU2. I have attached my configuration file. Any feedback would be highly appreciated.

Thank you.
Attached Files
File Type: txt config2D.txt (8.8 KB, 7 views)
maximus23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 7, 2016, 11:32
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 15
fpalacios is on a distinguished road
Hi Max,

Looking at your config file, I would change the following:
CFL_NUMBER= 4.0 -> CFL_NUMBER= 1.0 (at least for ~100 iterations, then you can increase the number or use the adaptive CFL number)
SPATIAL_ORDER_TURB= 2ND_ORDER -> SPATIAL_ORDER_TURB= 1ST_ORDER (more robust and the solutions are acceptable - if you are using a fine mesh)
KIND_TURB_MODEL=SST -> KIND_TURB_MODEL= SA (I think that SA is the only that has been validated with the incompressible mode).

Anyway, SU2 has been developed and validated in a community focus on compressible applications. For that reason, my main recommendation is to run the software with
REGIME_TYPE= COMPRESSIBLE and you need to follow a good tutorial to set the problem as
https://github.com/su2code/SU2/wiki/Turbulent-ONERA-M6


Thanks for using SU2,
Best Regards,
Francisco
fpalacios is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 8, 2016, 14:35
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Max
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11
maximus23 is on a distinguished road
Francisco,

Thank you for your reply, I will try your recommendations this week.

Regards,
Max
maximus23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spray Evaporation Divergence jennap223 STAR-CCM+ 1 October 12, 2015 04:03
divergence detected in AMG solver epsilon manju Main CFD Forum 2 April 8, 2015 02:26
Systematic FLUENT AMG DIVERGENCE with Delaunay Mesh benjamin_ FLUENT 0 July 24, 2014 08:26
Lid driven flow in shallow rectangular domain issues, MATLAB new_at_this Main CFD Forum 0 November 10, 2011 21:41
Primitive error at node- Floating point exception / continuity divergence issues phales15 FLUENT 0 April 30, 2011 20:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:17.