|
[Sponsors] |
June 30, 2015, 04:37 |
RANS FX63-137 kOmega SST model
|
#1 |
New Member
Pierluigi Rossi
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Milan
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 12 |
Dear SU2 users,
I am trying to calculate the polar data of Wortmann FX63-137 airfoil at Re = 1e6. To do this, I have started with RANS simulation at Re = 5e5 (aoa 6° and 9°) comparing my results with fig.18 in [1]. The setup that I have used is the following: Code:
% ------------- DIRECT, ADJOINT, AND LINEARIZED PROBLEM DEFINITION ------------% % % Physical governing equations (EULER, NAVIER_STOKES, % TNE2_EULER, TNE2_NAVIER_STOKES, % WAVE_EQUATION, HEAT_EQUATION, LINEAR_ELASTICITY, % POISSON_EQUATION) PHYSICAL_PROBLEM= NAVIER_STOKES % % Specify turbulent model (NONE, SA, SA_NEG, SST) KIND_TURB_MODEL= SST %SA % % Mathematical problem (DIRECT, ADJOINT, LINEARIZED) MATH_PROBLEM= DIRECT % % Regime type (COMPRESSIBLE, INCOMPRESSIBLE, FREESURFACE) REGIME_TYPE= INCOMPRESSIBLE % % Restart solution (NO, YES) RESTART_SOL= YES % ------------------------- UNSTEADY SIMULATION -------------------------------% % % Unsteady simulation (NO, TIME_STEPPING, DUAL_TIME_STEPPING-1ST_ORDER, % DUAL_TIME_STEPPING-2ND_ORDER, TIME_SPECTRAL) UNSTEADY_SIMULATION= NO % -------------------- INCOMPRESSIBLE FREE-STREAM DEFINITION ------------------% % % Free-stream density (1.2886 Kg/m^3 (air), 998.2 Kg/m^3 (water)) FREESTREAM_DENSITY= 1.225 % % Free-stream velocity (m/s) FREESTREAM_VELOCITY= ( 7.4701, 1.1832, 0.00 ) % % Free-stream viscosity (1.853E-5 Ns/m^2 (air), 0.798E-3 Ns/m^2 (water)) FREESTREAM_VISCOSITY= 1.853e-05 % ---------------------- REFERENCE VALUE DEFINITION ---------------------------% % % Reference origin for moment computation REF_ORIGIN_MOMENT_X = 0.25 REF_ORIGIN_MOMENT_Y = 0.00 REF_ORIGIN_MOMENT_Z = 0.00 % % Reference length for pitching, rolling, and yawing non-dimensional moment REF_LENGTH_MOMENT= 1.0 % % Reference area for force coefficients (0 implies automatic calculation) REF_AREA= 1.0 % -------------------- BOUNDARY CONDITION DEFINITION --------------------------% % % Navier-Stokes wall boundary marker(s) (NONE = no marker) MARKER_HEATFLUX= ( airfoil, 0.0 ) % % Farfield boundary marker(s) (NONE = no marker) MARKER_FAR= ( farfield ) % % Marker(s) of the surface to be plotted or designed MARKER_PLOTTING= ( airfoil ) % % Marker(s) of the surface where the functional (Cd, Cl, etc.) will be evaluated MARKER_MONITORING= ( airfoil ) % ------------- COMMON PARAMETERS DEFINING THE NUMERICAL METHOD ---------------% % % Numerical method for spatial gradients (GREEN_GAUSS, WEIGHTED_LEAST_SQUARES) NUM_METHOD_GRAD= WEIGHTED_LEAST_SQUARES % % Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition of the finest grid CFL_NUMBER= 10.0 % % Adaptive CFL number (NO, YES) CFL_ADAPT= NO % % Parameters of the adaptive CFL number (factor down, factor up, CFL min value, % CFL max value ) CFL_ADAPT_PARAM= ( 1.5, 0.5, 1.0, 100.0 ) % % Number of total iterations EXT_ITER= 10000 % ----------------------- SLOPE LIMITER DEFINITION ----------------------------% % % Reference element length for computing the slope and sharp edges limiters. REF_ELEM_LENGTH= 0.1 % % Coefficient for the limiter LIMITER_COEFF= 0.1 % % Coefficient for the sharp edges limiter SHARP_EDGES_COEFF= 3.0 % % Reference coefficient (sensitivity) for detecting sharp edges. REF_SHARP_EDGES= 3.0 % % Remove sharp edges from the sensitivity evaluation (NO, YES) SENS_REMOVE_SHARP= NO % ------------------------ LINEAR SOLVER DEFINITION ---------------------------% % % Linear solver for implicit formulations (BCGSTAB, FGMRES) LINEAR_SOLVER= FGMRES % % Preconditioner of the Krylov linear solver (JACOBI, LINELET, LU_SGS) LINEAR_SOLVER_PREC= LU_SGS % % Minimum error of the linear solver for implicit formulations LINEAR_SOLVER_ERROR= 1E-4 % % Max number of iterations of the linear solver for the implicit formulation LINEAR_SOLVER_ITER= 5 % -------------------------- MULTIGRID PARAMETERS -----------------------------% % % Multi-Grid Levels (0 = no multi-grid) MGLEVEL= 0 % % Multi-grid cycle (V_CYCLE, W_CYCLE, FULLMG_CYCLE) MGCYCLE= V_CYCLE % % Multi-grid pre-smoothing level MG_PRE_SMOOTH= ( 1, 2, 3, 3 ) % % Multi-grid post-smoothing level MG_POST_SMOOTH= ( 0, 0, 0, 0 ) % % Jacobi implicit smoothing of the correction MG_CORRECTION_SMOOTH= ( 0, 0, 0, 0 ) % % Damping factor for the residual restriction MG_DAMP_RESTRICTION= 0.75 % % Damping factor for the correction prolongation MG_DAMP_PROLONGATION= 0.75 % -------------------- FLOW NUMERICAL METHOD DEFINITION -----------------------% % % Convective numerical method (JST, LAX-FRIEDRICH, CUSP, ROE, AUSM, HLLC, % TURKEL_PREC, MSW) CONV_NUM_METHOD_FLOW= ROE % % Spatial numerical order integration (1ST_ORDER, 2ND_ORDER, 2ND_ORDER_LIMITER) % SPATIAL_ORDER_FLOW= 2ND_ORDER_LIMITER % % Slope limiter (VENKATAKRISHNAN, MINMOD) SLOPE_LIMITER_FLOW= VENKATAKRISHNAN % % 1st, 2nd and 4th order artificial dissipation coefficients AD_COEFF_FLOW= ( 0.15, 0.5, 0.02 ) % % Time discretization (RUNGE-KUTTA_EXPLICIT, EULER_IMPLICIT, EULER_EXPLICIT) TIME_DISCRE_FLOW= EULER_IMPLICIT % -------------------- TURBULENT NUMERICAL METHOD DEFINITION ------------------% % % Convective numerical method (SCALAR_UPWIND) CONV_NUM_METHOD_TURB= SCALAR_UPWIND % % Spatial numerical order integration (1ST_ORDER, 2ND_ORDER, 2ND_ORDER_LIMITER) % SPATIAL_ORDER_TURB= 1ST_ORDER % % Slope limiter (VENKATAKRISHNAN, MINMOD) SLOPE_LIMITER_TURB= VENKATAKRISHNAN % % Time discretization (EULER_IMPLICIT) TIME_DISCRE_TURB= EULER_IMPLICIT % --------------------------- CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS --------------------------% % % Convergence criteria (CAUCHY, RESIDUAL) % CONV_CRITERIA= RESIDUAL % % Residual reduction (order of magnitude with respect to the initial value) RESIDUAL_REDUCTION= 5 %6 % % Min value of the residual (log10 of the residual) RESIDUAL_MINVAL= -7 %-10 % % Start convergence criteria at iteration number STARTCONV_ITER= 10 % % Number of elements to apply the criteria CAUCHY_ELEMS= 100 % % Epsilon to control the series convergence CAUCHY_EPS= 1E-6 % % Function to apply the criteria (LIFT, DRAG, NEARFIELD_PRESS, SENS_GEOMETRY, % SENS_MACH, DELTA_LIFT, DELTA_DRAG) CAUCHY_FUNC_FLOW= DRAG % ------------------------- INPUT/OUTPUT INFORMATION --------------------------% % % Mesh input file MESH_FILENAME= ./../mesh1.su2 % % Mesh input file format (SU2, CGNS, NETCDF_ASCII) MESH_FORMAT= SU2 % % Mesh output file MESH_OUT_FILENAME= mesh_out.su2 % % Restart flow input file SOLUTION_FLOW_FILENAME= restart_flow.dat % % Restart adjoint input file SOLUTION_ADJ_FILENAME= solution_adj.dat % % Output file format (PARAVIEW, TECPLOT, STL) OUTPUT_FORMAT= PARAVIEW %TECPLOT % % Output file convergence history (w/o extension) CONV_FILENAME= history % % Output file restart flow RESTART_FLOW_FILENAME= restart_flow.dat % % Output file restart adjoint RESTART_ADJ_FILENAME= restart_adj.dat % % Output file flow (w/o extension) variables VOLUME_FLOW_FILENAME= flow % % Output file adjoint (w/o extension) variables VOLUME_ADJ_FILENAME= adjoint % % Output objective function gradient (using continuous adjoint) GRAD_OBJFUNC_FILENAME= of_grad.dat % % Output file surface flow coefficient (w/o extension) SURFACE_FLOW_FILENAME= surface_flow % % Output file surface adjoint coefficient (w/o extension) SURFACE_ADJ_FILENAME= surface_adjoint % % Writing solution file frequency WRT_SOL_FREQ= 1000 % % Writing convergence history frequency WRT_CON_FREQ= 1 How much small the residual minval has to be? Have you done similar simulations with kOmega SST model? If yes, how good are your results comparing with experimental results in the fully turbulent case? Thank you very much for the help, best regards. Pier References: [1] Selig, M.S., and McGranahan, B.D., “Wind Tunnel Aerodynamic Tests of Six Airfoils for Use on Small Wind Turbines,” NREL/SR-500-34515, Oct. 2004. http://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/pubs/...RNAirfoils.pdf Last edited by PierluigiRossi; June 30, 2015 at 04:38. Reason: adding link to the paper |
|
July 14, 2015, 17:33 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Thomas D. Economon
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Stanford, CA
Posts: 271
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi Pierluigi,
For the incompressible case, have you tried the S-A model first? I would recommend starting there, since we have spent more time verifying the S-A model with the incompressible solver. You might also try in compressible mode (if the Mach number isn't too low) with both S-A and SST. Hope this helps, Tom |
|
June 24, 2016, 06:56 |
about the configuration file
|
#3 |
New Member
GUO Hanching
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
I am new to SU2, and working on the similar work. I have a doubt about this configuration file. I need to calculate the aerodynamic coefficient of an airfoil under different reynolds number(from 10000 to 60000), how can i change the reynolds number in this configuration file. only free stream velocity? if i want to change the chord length, where should I modify the parameters?
thanks a lot. |
|
Tags |
fx63-137, komegasst, rans |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Free CFD code with implementation of Menter's k-omega SST model | nikola_m | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 8, 2020 13:13 |
wall treatment k-w SST model in Fluent | behest | FLUENT | 0 | December 26, 2014 09:14 |
Viscosity ratio in gamma-theta transition model based on k-w sst turb model | Qiaol618 | Main CFD Forum | 8 | June 9, 2012 07:43 |
convergence problem of the SST and RNG k-e model for mixing tank | ziyan7 | FLUENT | 0 | March 8, 2011 07:13 |
Fluent 12 k-w SST turbulence model | DarrenC | FLUENT | 0 | December 13, 2009 09:33 |