CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Problems when using HLLC to solve NACA0012

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 19, 2015, 10:47
Default Problems when using HLLC to solve NACA0012
  #1
New Member
 
Yan Bochao
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 12
wruudf is on a distinguished road
When I'm trying to use HLLC as the convective numerical method to run the NACA0012 test case in quick start, the residual keep a very high level and never converged.

Like this:

Iter Time(s) Res[Rho] Res[RhoE] CLift(Total) CDrag(Total)
3280 0.197821 -3.372983 2.177480 0.335392 0.022200
3281 0.197818 -3.441973 2.102265 0.335399 0.022206
3282 0.197817 -3.541882 1.945486 0.335422 0.022213
3283 0.197816 -3.534004 2.001859 0.335395 0.022203
3284 0.197815 -3.524070 2.163939 0.335392 0.022202
3285 0.197813 -3.515924 2.023638 0.335435 0.022217
3286 0.197811 -3.554574 1.965987 0.335365 0.022194
3287 0.197809 -3.339415 2.204189 0.335412 0.022212

Roe seems to have the same result.
1. Are these two method still available in SU2? and how can I make them work?

Also, I've checked the numerics_direct_mean.cpp, and it does have some code about HLLC and Roe method.
2. Is this file the right place if I want to make a change on the solvers?
wruudf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2015, 13:45
Default
  #2
hlk
Senior Member
 
Heather Kline
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 309
Rep Power: 14
hlk is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by wruudf View Post
When I'm trying to use HLLC as the convective numerical method to run the NACA0012 test case in quick start, the residual keep a very high level and never converged.

Like this:

Iter Time(s) Res[Rho] Res[RhoE] CLift(Total) CDrag(Total)
3280 0.197821 -3.372983 2.177480 0.335392 0.022200
3281 0.197818 -3.441973 2.102265 0.335399 0.022206
3282 0.197817 -3.541882 1.945486 0.335422 0.022213
3283 0.197816 -3.534004 2.001859 0.335395 0.022203
3284 0.197815 -3.524070 2.163939 0.335392 0.022202
3285 0.197813 -3.515924 2.023638 0.335435 0.022217
3286 0.197811 -3.554574 1.965987 0.335365 0.022194
3287 0.197809 -3.339415 2.204189 0.335412 0.022212

Roe seems to have the same result.
1. Are these two method still available in SU2? and how can I make them work?

Also, I've checked the numerics_direct_mean.cpp, and it does have some code about HLLC and Roe method.
2. Is this file the right place if I want to make a change on the solvers?
Thank you for your question
1. These methods are still available in SU2. For all solvers, whether and how quickly it converges is sensitive to many factors - the solver settings, the mesh, and the flow conditions all effect this. The settings in the QuickStart should be tuned to work well with the solver specified in that file - changing the solver may require things like lowering the CFL number or using the limiters. You will find more examples in the TestCases folder available on github. Make sure that you check out the version that corresponds to the version of the code you are using.

2. yes.
hlk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2015, 18:14
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Yan Bochao
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 12
wruudf is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much. I just find there is a NACA0012 in incomp_euler folder and it works with Roe. But is there any way that I can get the description of this test case instead of reading all the information from the cfg file?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hlk View Post
Thank you for your question
1. These methods are still available in SU2. For all solvers, whether and how quickly it converges is sensitive to many factors - the solver settings, the mesh, and the flow conditions all effect this. The settings in the QuickStart should be tuned to work well with the solver specified in that file - changing the solver may require things like lowering the CFL number or using the limiters. You will find more examples in the TestCases folder available on github. Make sure that you check out the version that corresponds to the version of the code you are using.

2. yes.
wruudf is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 December 1, 2020 12:12
Can openfoam solve problems in cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems? GGerber OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 February 5, 2015 11:37
Can Fidap solve dynamic mesh problems? Sandy FLUENT 0 September 29, 2003 01:45
How to solve another continuum and momentum eqn? west_wing FLUENT 0 August 25, 2003 11:00
extremely simple problem... can you solve it properly? Mikhail Main CFD Forum 40 September 9, 1999 10:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17.