|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Hedley
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Can SU2 accurately solve 3d wing at low mach numbers ie less than 0.3 . If so do any group members know what the optimal settings in the .cfg file should be . I noticed in another post that on the naca 2d airfoil the roe solver did not converge but the roe turkel did.
Most of the 3d examples / tutorials are at mach .8 and greater . A tutorial setting out the entire toolchain would be useful. Ie 3d model -> mesh considerations and what effect they have -> solver setting for various use cases -> visualizing the output in para view or tecplot. Last edited by hedley; May 21, 2014 at 13:33. Reason: Auto spell corrections |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hi,
In principle, SU2 should work properly at Mach number of the order of 0.3, if you go below 0.01 my recommendation is to use the incompressible solver (REGIME_TYPE=INCOMPRESSIBLE). Thanks for using SU2, Francisco |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Obtaining Reynolds Number in FLUENT | Emmanuel | FLUENT | 2 | April 7, 2016 01:46 |
Turbulence model for low Reynolds number flow? | Nokadu | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 26, 2013 11:42 |
Reynolds Number matching in Cavity flow | Endee | Main CFD Forum | 6 | April 20, 2010 04:47 |
non-dimensional analysis in Fluent | Endee | FLUENT | 8 | September 7, 2005 16:16 |
About low Reynolds number airfoil experiment data. | zqnwpu | Main CFD Forum | 5 | December 25, 2004 03:52 |