|
[Sponsors] |
March 17, 2013, 16:05 |
Inviscid Onera
|
#1 |
New Member
cody
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
Code:
Generic Warning: Generic Warning: In /home/cody/Downloads/paraview/ParaView-3.98.1-source/VTK/IO/Legacy/vtkDataReader.cxx, line 1388 Error reading ascii data. Possible mismatch of datasize with declaration. The lambda pattern is visible, correct, and identical for Pressure_Coefficients in both MPI and non-MPI versions of surface_flow.vtk. What could cause these errors? I have tried using Paraview 3.14 (Ubuntu default) and Paraview 3.98-1 compiled manually with no effect. |
|
March 19, 2013, 20:55 |
|
#2 |
New Member
cody
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
I have since computed the turbulent onera case in parallel using the default mesh and received the same errors in Paraview when opening surface_flow.vtk
I have computed tutorials 1-5 and 7 without issue, so I opened the flow.vtk (volume mesh) in Paraview for inviscid and turbulent Onera cases, the former computed in serial and parallel, to find that all the information was available and qualitatively correct (M_max 1.53 M_min 0.109), even though Mach_Number is missing from the surface_flow.vtk output. I'm assuming the larger range of Mach number is due to the range of Mach number throughout the volume as opposed to the surface values shown in the tutorial. I didn't find any part of the configuration file that allows one to select/omit output variables to the Tecplot or Paraview files. Barring that I'm assuming this is a bug in the Paraview output? Last edited by codygo; March 19, 2013 at 21:34. |
|
March 20, 2013, 13:36 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi
I have received same error for turbulent Onera using fine mesh available in test cases, but only when I run multigrid.... if multigrid is off the Paraview output is good. |
|
March 21, 2013, 22:34 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks a lot for your interest in SU2,
The new version of SU2 (2.0.2) counts with a new I/O based on Tecplot (binary and ascii), and CGNS (that can be used by paraview users). As far I know VisIt counts also with a Tecplot reader (https://wci.llnl.gov/codes/visit/). Anyway, using the current structure of the code it is very easy to create a paraview output format from scratch. If you are interested, my recommendation is to use output_WriteTecplotASCII.cpp as baseline and write something similar for paraview. Once you finish it, if you are interested, we can add the code to the official release (with the appropriate credits for the authors). Best, Francisco |
|
March 21, 2013, 22:51 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Cean
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 16 |
VisIt is beter than ParaView in reading Tecplot binary format.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inviscid flow solver | luca_g | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | August 11, 2024 11:52 |
Inviscid Flow | cfd seeker | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 8, 2012 01:53 |
Inviscid Euler flow | Ryan Sidin | CFX | 1 | May 18, 2007 23:36 |
inviscid | Sylvain | FLUENT | 6 | October 30, 2005 14:58 |
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 13:19 |