|
[Sponsors] |
3D RANS based shape optimisation mesh deformation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 30, 2022, 05:36 |
3D RANS based shape optimisation mesh deformation
|
#1 |
New Member
Nikki
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi everyone,
I am trying to setup a 3D RANS based shape optimisation on a wing. For this I use the Free-Form Deformation (FFD) method and placed a box around the part of the geometry that I want to deform. While the mapping of the FFD box onto the mesh seems to be okay, the subsequent mesh deformation results in unfeasible meshes. In particular, as the optimisation is RANS based the mesh contains prism layers, the mesh deformation method does not correctly deform these prism layers resulting in a completely wrong estimation of the friction drag. Some more information on my mesh and the used deformation settings: Mesh:
Deformation settings: DEFORM_LINEAR_SOLVER= CONJUGATE_GRADIENT DEFORM_LINEAR_SOLVER_PREC= ILU DEFORM_LINEAR_SOLVER_ITER= 350 DEFORM_NONLINEAR_ITER= 1 DEFORM_LINEAR_SOLVER_ERROR= 1e-12 DEFORM_CONSOLE_OUTPUT= YES DEFORM_STIFFNESS_TYPE= INVERSE_VOLUME DEFORM_LIMIT = 1E6 DEFORM_COEFF = 1E6 DEFORM_ELASTICITY_MODULUS= 3E11 As many design variables (FFD box control points) are involved, the conjugate gradient method seems to work better in terms of memory usage compared to FGMRES. Moreover, both the wall distance and inverse volume stiffness deformation methods do not result in proper mesh deformations. Though I have read in other threads and thesis papers on best practices for mesh deformation that the inverse volume method is the best when prism layers are involved. The last 3 inputs (DEFORM_LIMIT, DEFORM_COEFF, DEFORM_ELASTICITY_MODULUS) were not seen in the standard configuration file posted on the Git of SU2, I obtained these inputs via several other threads/google searches. While the solver does not throw an error saying they are invalid inputs, they also do not show up in the config_DEF.cfg file. So I am wondering whether these actually have an influence / are valid inputs. (Side note, I am using the newest version of SU2 V7.3.1) Is there someone who has experience with 3D viscous mesh deformations who can provide me with some tips and tricks on how to move forward, and maybe highlight some possible mesh deformation settings that I have not included yet? Thanks in advance! |
|
Tags |
mesh deformation, rans, shape optimisation, viscous layers |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh/splitMeshRegion : region1 in zone "-1" | GuiMagyar | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | August 4, 2023 13:38 |
foam-extend-4.1 release | hjasak | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 19 | July 16, 2021 06:02 |
[blockMesh] Floating Point Exception while generating wedge based mesh | jns-v | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 9 | July 8, 2021 06:36 |
GeometricField -> mesh() Function | Tobi | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 10 | November 19, 2020 12:33 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |