|
[Sponsors] |
January 23, 2015, 08:56 |
Restarting solutions
|
#1 |
New Member
Ross
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello all,
I have been trying to run SU2 and I believe I am unable to restart properly SU2 simulations. I will reach a point in the simulation where I have a low residuals, for instance prior to stopping I have a max residual of -7.5 and on restart I have a max residual of +2, with no parameters changed in .cfg other than switching restart from NO to YES. I am treating the software as I would use Fluent where I can cancel a simulation, change parameters and start where I left, perhaps this is incorrect. I have now installed SU2 on three different computers (linux) and had no luck either restarting generally or when using the continuous_adjoint.py script. I am certain I am following the correct procedure but it is quite likely I have missed something. Initially I was interested in using the restart function for convenience and transitioning from 1st to 2nd order, now however I want to test the adjoint and optimisation and clearly restarting is essential. In order to rectify I tried a number of methods of stopping and then restarting: -Terminating solution in terminal -Defining a number of iterations in the .cfg -Reaching convergence I have also -installed on a number of computers -Tried versions 3.2.5 and 3.2.7 -Ran one of the continuous adjoint test cases Has anybody had issues like this before? Thank you. Regards, Ross. |
|
February 18, 2015, 14:51 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Ross,
Sorry for the late reply, in order to properly restart SU2. You should typically rename the restart_flow.dat file to solution_flow.dat In other words we use RESTART_FLOW_FILENAME= restart_flow.dat to write a restart file and SOLUTION_FLOW_FILENAME= solution_flow.dat to read a solution file. but you can use the same name for both. The same applies to the adjoint restart. Thanks for using SU2, Francisco Palacios SU2 lead developer |
|
March 1, 2015, 07:49 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Ross
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you Francisco,
I have since moved from using the developers version to the 3.2.8 stable release and the problem has been resolved. I presume it was to do with my installation methods. Many thanks, Ross |
|
March 5, 2015, 13:28 |
|
#4 |
Member
varghese mathew
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: India
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 12 |
does the same apply for typical wing section module .as stated in jj alonso paper the wing is first kept in pitching for 3 cyles then the free response is measured for 2d flutter solution removing the holding pin .can i use the pitching case first as direct analysi for time equal t= 0.33 sec and later setup the 2d config file for flutter using the class solver typical wing section and use the last 2 output from pitching case to start the flutter response by switching to restart option with changing the file name of pitching case to solution _flow .dat from restart_flow .dat and run the response if not what should be the correct procedure.let me know if possible ----
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Steady Euler Solutions and the Effects of Dissipation | emellqui | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 18, 2014 13:47 |
CFD Solutions & Training at affordable rate | BHE | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 12, 2013 08:54 |
Pressure drop calculation and comparison to analytic solutions | n0name | STAR-CCM+ | 2 | August 16, 2012 04:36 |
Analytical flow solutions | Antonio | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 14, 2005 16:43 |
Analytical flow solutions | Antonio | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 15, 2005 18:47 |