|
[Sponsors] |
shape optimization for RAE2822 with constraint on area |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 9, 2014, 11:46 |
shape optimization for RAE2822 with constraint on area
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi
I am new to SU2, and tried to optimize RAE2822 with a number of constraints. One is the airfoil Area > initial_Area. So I set: OPT_CONSTRAINT= ( LIFT > 0.824 ) * 0.001; ( MOMENT_Z > -0.092 ) * 0.001; ( EQUIVALENT_AREA > 0.07787 ) * 0.001 the errors I got: ------------------------- Exit Success (SU2_CFD) ------------------------ done: 0.8478197895 Moment_Z... done: 0.1048105494 Equivalent_Area... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/shape_optimization.py", line 130, in <module> main() File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/shape_optimization.py", line 75, in main options.step ) File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/shape_optimization.py", line 113, in shape_optimization SU2.opt.SLSQP(project,x0,xb,its) File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/SU2/opt/scipy_tools.py", line 102, in scipy_slsqp epsilon = 1.0e-06 ) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scipy/optimize/slsqp.py", line 236, in fmin_slsqp mieq = len(f_ieqcons(x)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scipy/optimize/optimize.py", line 176, in function_wrapper return function(x, *args) File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/SU2/opt/scipy_tools.py", line 187, in con_cieq cons = project.con_cieq(x) File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/SU2/opt/project.py", line 223, in con_cieq return self._eval(konfig, func,dvs) File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/SU2/opt/project.py", line 172, in _eval vals = design._eval(func,*args) File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/SU2/eval/design.py", line 132, in _eval vals = eval_func(*inputs) File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/SU2/eval/design.py", line 422, in con_cieq func = su2func(this_con,config,state) File "/usr/local/SU2/bin/SU2/eval/functions.py", line 94, in function func_out = state['FUNCTIONS'][func_name] KeyError: 'EQUIVALENT_AREA' when I removed the area constraint it works fine. Can anyone help me with it? I also tried different scaling factor but no help thanks |
|
September 21, 2014, 22:39 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 15 |
Oops... EQUIVALENT_AREA area is related with the supersonic Area Rule (this is for minimizing the sonic boom in supersonic aircraft design one of SU2 specialties).
Best, Francisco |
|
September 22, 2014, 06:41 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi thanks a lot Francisco, but then how can I put the constraint on the airfoil area?
note that the constraint is not about the thickness but the total area is no less than the original. maybe I should use "AREA" instead. but then the question is the quatity, in the reference area I set (for airfoil) REF_AREA = 1, so can I set the constraint on area as "( AREA > 1 ) * scale" ? thanks for your help |
|
September 29, 2019, 19:23 |
|
#4 |
New Member
cfdjetman
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7 |
I'm doing the exact same case in SU2 6.2. I used AIRFOIL_AREA >0.0778. However, when I can calculate the area of the airfoil of the optimized shape it is typically around 0.0700. I'm not sure how not to violate this constraint.
I had couple of questions. 1. How does the scaling factors on the objective function and constraints affect them? Currently, I just use a scaling factor of 1. What if I used 0.001 instead? 2.Do I need to change the optimizer accuracy accordingly? For e.g, if I used 1e-06 for the drag objective function with scaling factor of 1, do I need to change this to 1e-09 for scaling factor of 0.001? 3. Is there any way of viewing the area of an airfoil in SU2? I currently use the surface file to calculate the airfoil area in MATLAB. 4. As mentioned above, how not to violate the area constraint? Thanks |
|
Tags |
help needed |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what are the scaling factors of Optimization objective and constraint functions ? | mechy | SU2 Shape Design | 4 | September 22, 2017 04:23 |
Non overlap area fractions | saisanthoshm88 | CFX | 11 | September 17, 2015 19:42 |
Airfoil Shape Optimization using gradient based methods | jaiswal | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 10, 2014 12:22 |
Shape Optimization Error, Incorrect values produces by SU2_GDC | Dhig | SU2 Shape Design | 1 | March 20, 2014 06:58 |
CFX Solver Memory Error | mike | CFX | 1 | March 19, 2008 08:22 |