|
[Sponsors] |
Explicit time integration of shells without "drilling" DOF |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 17, 2024, 07:56 |
Explicit time integration of shells without "drilling" DOF
|
#1 |
Member
Anders Aamodt Resell
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 4 |
A number of shell elements have only 5 degrees of freedom (3 translations and 2 rotations). In explicit FEM, it is common to use the central difference method, and for instance in the paper of Belytschko et. al. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(84)90026-4 it is stated that this method is used.
However, to me it doesn't seem trivial to extend the central difference method for translational DOFs to a setting with rotational DOFs, ESPECIALLY when there are only two rotational degrees of freedom. I have some idea of how this can be done with three rotational DOFs, then you can use an exponential map to update a rotation matrix or quaternion that describes the nodal rotation. If someone has any pointers or sources on how this can be done in the 5 DOF setting, I would be happy to hear it. |
|
Tags |
central difference, drill, rotations, shell |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bash script for pseudo-parallel usage of reconstructPar | kwardle | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 42 | May 8, 2024 00:17 |
Slow calculation time on CFD server | killian153 | Hardware | 4 | July 27, 2021 08:28 |
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam | chrizzl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 28, 2017 06:49 |
same geometry,structured and unstructured mesh,different behaviour. | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | January 2, 2013 23:40 |
Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 19:07 |