|
[Sponsors] |
Having problems with getting a job to run; axle with over closure |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 27, 2018, 10:59 |
Having problems with getting a job to run; axle with over closure
|
#1 |
New Member
Bjorn
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8 |
In my job there is an axel which is forced through a bore. The bore has several `noses` or `ribs` which are used to hold the axel in place while reducing friction during assembly. There is an over-closure between the noses and the axel in the model, which creates a large stress in this location. We are attempting to find the force required to push/pull the axel back out of the bore, however each attempted job fails, with less than 10% of the load having been calculated. (It reached 10% on only one of the iterations.)
If you need any input or output files I can provide them, but any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks |
|
August 28, 2018, 09:18 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8 |
what software do you use?
if you add fem pics it will be great) |
|
August 29, 2018, 07:47 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Bjorn
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi,
I am using the abaqus deck within ANSA. Here is a picture of the support, with the noses highlighted in yellow, and a cross section of the assembly including the axel. The scalar results shown are just for tests and are not relevant. Assembly.png Support.png |
|
August 29, 2018, 09:02 |
|
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8 |
the question is:
why does solution break?=) do you use dynamic? or quasi-static? could you show contact/interaction cards msq/sta files? p.s.it's best pair-abqs+ansa!=) just to my mind! |
|
August 29, 2018, 12:05 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Bjorn
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Here are the contact and interference setup, as well as the msg file. Thanks for your help Contact.png Contact2.png 180827_ventil_fem_small_test.txt |
||
August 29, 2018, 13:54 |
|
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8 |
adjust=yes
val=0 smal sliding=no use dynamic quasi-static analysis, it's better for convergence nonlinear solver should be switched i can't understand your text file. why did you merge it? sta, msg and dat file i need separately. |
|
August 30, 2018, 05:50 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
Bjorn
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
180827_ventil_fem_small_test dat.txt 180827_ventil_fem_small_test msg.txt 180827_ventil_fem_small_test sta.txt |
||
August 30, 2018, 06:39 |
|
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8 |
hi!
it's interesting=) do init inc=0.01 and could i look STEP inp? you haven't interaction and load i think... |
|
August 30, 2018, 07:55 |
|
#9 | |
New Member
Bjorn
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
What do you mean by init inc? is that the TIME INC in the step? What do I set TIME PER then? Thanks Edit: Okay I set TIME INC to 0.01 and TIME PER to 1 and there is still no force or anything in the simulation. I was able to get a force when using static analysis, however I was getting a huge amount of repetitive errors in the msg file, so I am not sure if the setup was correct. Last edited by nolanb13; August 30, 2018 at 09:19. Reason: extra info |
||
August 30, 2018, 10:04 |
|
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8 |
could you send STEP part by .txt?
what is the load in your model? impose displacement? Force? p.s.i can look your model in the evening, but my computer is so weak. |
|
August 30, 2018, 10:16 |
|
#11 | |
New Member
Bjorn
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Sorry I dont know what you mean by the STEP part. Do you want to see my input file? |
||
August 30, 2018, 10:45 |
|
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8 |
Wow!
i see. if you use adjust=yes your penetration will be pepaired=) if i were you i would model the assemble. you should push through axle. move out axle from hole. and start to model how it will be assembled. did i understand you correctly? |
|
August 30, 2018, 10:50 |
|
#13 | |
New Member
Bjorn
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
I am making the model with assembly already completed, then I am attempting to simulate 'dis-assembly' by pulled the axle out. I need to find out how much force is required to do this. |
||
August 30, 2018, 12:09 |
|
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8 |
but you have penetration at first time!
how do you can discribe it? Can you interpretate this issue? it isn't physical force, because you haven't the overclosure in your axle. your axle was being deformed during assemble process. to my mind you should assemble it. and to move out. if i have time in the evening i will do simple model for you. it will be my opinion about your issue. |
|
August 30, 2018, 12:20 |
|
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8 |
will be pepaired
sorry REPAIRED |
|
August 30, 2018, 18:42 |
|
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8 |
||
August 31, 2018, 04:58 |
|
#17 | |
New Member
Bjorn
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Thank you for your work in attempting my model and for the link, however I cannot access google drive at work. Unless there is some other way you can show me what you have done I will have to wait until tomorrow. |
||
Tags |
abaqus cae, failed, over closure, structural mechanics |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Partitioning problems in the parallel job | Neo | FLUENT | 5 | January 26, 2021 11:10 |
[OpenFOAM.org] Problems to install openfoam-2.4.0 on Ubuntu 16.04.01LTS | matheusmonjon | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | February 25, 2017 15:46 |
[OpenFOAM] Problems using paraFoam -touch after parallel run | arieljeds | ParaView | 9 | May 24, 2016 14:08 |
run f;uent job in batch mode? | jx | FLUENT | 5 | July 2, 2003 12:29 |
cfd job | Dr. Don I anyanwu | Main CFD Forum | 20 | May 17, 1999 16:13 |