|
[Sponsors] |
Mesh sensitivity when using phase change models |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 28, 2012, 21:51 |
Mesh sensitivity when using phase change models
|
#1 |
New Member
Brenton King
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
I am having problems with the variation of solidification rate when solving different mesh sizes while using the Eularian multiphase VOF model with enthalpy-melting-solidification models enabled in CCM+. I am solving the simplest model I could make (a 10x10x10mm cube) and using adiabatic surfaces on all boundary conditions bar two. The two faces that aren't adiabatic are set at different temperatures causing a delta T across the phase change material to induce melting. I am solving in unsteady state because I want to measure the rate at which the cube will melt. The mesh size is causing large variances in the rate at which the cube melts. A finer mesh will cause the cube to react slowly and melting takes a long time. Where as a coarser mesh will cause the cube to react faster and melt quickly. I varied the mesh from 16 cells to around 37 million cells and I haven't been able to reach convergence on my mesh sensitivity test simply because I ran out of memory (96GB!) due to fact that the finest mesh I can create is too fine (100 million cells). Has anyone experienced such a large sensitivity in mesh size before? Feel free to ask any questions you need to. |
|
Tags |
cd-adapco, melting, mesh, phase change, sensitivity |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thermal phase change model | Piti | CFX | 1 | January 14, 2021 11:03 |
engrid -> save as .stl with boundarie codes | Zymon | enGrid | 31 | August 29, 2011 14:40 |
Change parameters for Hybrid mesh | karananand | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 3 | July 18, 2010 17:37 |
Solid/liquid phase change using large viscosity | gregor.vidmar153 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | June 10, 2010 07:31 |
thermal phase change question | CFDflying | CFX | 1 | February 18, 2004 05:10 |