|
[Sponsors] |
July 2, 2011, 06:52 |
convergence criterium without normalization
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,
im working on an free jet with STARCCM+ and try to get an converged solution. In the Dokumentation of CD-Adapco they propose an criterium of 10^-3 for all Residuals. For normalized Residuals i am nearly not able to keep this condition. When i turning the normalizationoption off, it is no Problem to get Residuals under 10^-6. What do u think is the better way to judge the Residuals. With normalization or without? And what do u think is the absolute value the residuals should fall under, when turning the normalization off? Thanks for every help ;-) And if u dont understand because of my bad English skills ask and i will try to formulate the parts new. Kind Regards |
|
July 10, 2011, 06:38 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 22 |
I think, you should judge convergence by looking on some engineering values, not just residuals. For example, look on a mass flow through a boundary, lift or drag or whatever coefficients, or the values you are interested in.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
convergence criterium for unsteady 3D VOF | jack1980 | FLUENT | 2 | February 28, 2010 10:04 |
Convergence of CFX field in FSI analysis | nasdak | CFX | 2 | June 29, 2009 02:17 |
the criterium of convergence for the SIMPLE algo | Lam | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 25, 2007 10:08 |
Defect correction and convergence | ganesh | Main CFD Forum | 4 | June 30, 2006 15:20 |
HELP!Convergence Criterium | Teresa | FLUENT | 4 | July 27, 2005 12:53 |