|
[Sponsors] |
March 10, 2011, 13:29 |
bionic bender vs. 90° reference bender
|
#1 |
New Member
hhuh huhu
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi community,
i have simulated a real test about the pressure drop over an evulotionary developed bender (maeander bender) vs a reference 90° bender. In the real test the maeander bender generated a pressure drop around 15-25% less the reference one. I build the exact geometrie of both bender in starccm+, and reviewed both in some simulations with following specs: 1. K-Omega - SST, Low y+ 2. K-Omega - SST, All y+ 3. RSS - Linear Pressure Strain, Two Layer I used in physic-continuum, gas - air, steady, segregated flow, 3-D and turbulent. The Mesh is genereted to have an overall y+<1 with the low y+, and between 30<y+<60 with the all y+/two layer wall treatment. My problem ist that in starccm the maeander bender creates a higher pressure drop then the reference bender, but this in confict to the real results. I hope u can give me any explanation for this case. regards weigsi |
|
Tags |
bender, flow, how to, mesh, problem |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFoam-1.7.x on Suse 11.2 (64bit) does not compile | val46 | OpenFOAM Installation | 4 | August 27, 2010 04:43 |
Error with Wmake | skabilan | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | July 28, 2009 01:35 |
OpenFOAM on MinGW crosscompiler hosted on Linux | allenzhao | OpenFOAM Installation | 127 | January 30, 2009 20:08 |
G95 + CGNS | Bruno | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 30, 2007 01:34 |
Building OpenFoAm on SGI Altix 64bits | anne | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | June 15, 2006 10:27 |