|
[Sponsors] |
Seeting up Permeable Surfaces for use with FW-H Acoustics in CCM+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 24, 2011, 06:37 |
Seeting up Permeable Surfaces for use with FW-H Acoustics in CCM+
|
#1 |
New Member
Matt Hollins
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi all,
I have found the CCM+ tutorial on using the FW-H analogy for aeroacoustics incomplete. It gives directions for setting up the impermeable surface (wall boundaries) but does not do so for the permeable surface - a very important feature when using FW-H! I was hoping someone else might be able to point me in the right direction. When I try and set up a permeable surface I cannot select any parts to use as the surface - how do I go about this please? I would also be grateful for any warnings of pitfalls I may encounter whilst conducting my analysis. Thanks, Matt |
|
February 25, 2011, 13:22 |
|
#2 |
Member
Vinicius Girardi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 17 |
You must create those surfaces inside the model as internal interaces and use them as permeable surfaces in the FW-H model.
|
|
February 28, 2011, 16:27 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Matt Hollins
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 16 |
Thankyou for your reply Vinicius.
I have managed to do this now, however I am unsure what to set the boundary type to? For example I have created a landing gear geometry. I have then created a sphere around this and set it up as an internal interface. The boundary still exists as a viscous wall though. I want the boundary to not affect the fluid dynamics at all. Even setting it as a freestream condition would alter my results as flow features would not be able to propagate properly. How do I counter this? Thanks again for your help. Matt |
|
February 28, 2011, 16:30 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Matt Hollins
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 16 |
Ahh, I think I may have been confused.
As the boundary does not have a part selected for it, then I do not think it exists and so is not a problem. I have selected the sphere for the internal interface though. Is this correct? Matt |
|
February 28, 2011, 16:40 |
|
#5 |
Member
Vinicius Girardi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 17 |
Thatīs correct. Once you create the interface between the boundaries they donīt have anymore their properties, but the interface ones...
So, for your permeable surface, select the internal interface youīve created. |
|
December 12, 2016, 09:53 |
|
#6 |
Member
Polard
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi Reynolds
How were you able to calculate the overall sound pressure levels ? can you explain as I am modelling the jet noise and is facing similar problems. |
|
December 13, 2019, 03:36 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Federica Fregosi
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7 |
Can you please tell me where do you find the tutorial CCM+ on using the FW-H analogy for aeroacoustics? Thank you.
|
|
May 24, 2024, 00:13 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi Vincius, could you please explain this operation more specific?This is a question from 2024 and STARCCM still got no tutor about creating permeable interface.
|
|
Tags |
aeroacoustics, ccm+, fw-h, permeable, star-ccm+ |
|
|