CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

K-Omega SST Turbulence Model

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 19, 2010, 13:08
Default K-Omega SST Turbulence Model
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 17
nvtrieu is on a distinguished road
I'm doing simulation the flow over NACA0012 airfoil. In order to predict the lift/drag coefficient as long as the stall angle, the k-omega SST turbulence model is used.
The flow's specifications as follows:
-Velocity inlet: U=91.79 m/s
-Chord length: c=1 m
-Reynolds number: Re=6 million
-Fluid density: rho=1.2126 kg/m3
-Dynamic viscosity: muy=1.86x10^-5 Pa-s
Boundary conditions:
-Velocity inlet: inlet
-No-slip wall: foil
-Pressure outlet: outlet

When I selected the Turbulence specification is "k + omega" for Initial condition and for Inlet boundary condition, after running several iterations, I got this error:"Sever error: A floating point exception has occurred: floating point exception [overflow]. The specific cause cannot be identified. Potential causes may include: (a) solution divergence due to poor mesh quality, crude initialization, etc., or (b) errors in user-defined code or field functions."

This error also happened when I selected "Intensity + Length scale" for Initial condition.

Although, I used a very fine mesh with y+<1 (C-mesh). And I did not defined any field function.

However, when the Turbulence specification was turned into "Intensity + Viscosity ratio" for Initial condition, there was no error.

My first question is: Why I cannot change the Turbulence specification in Initial condition as I did?
The reason why I would select "k+omega" for Initial condition and for inlet boundary is I'm going to set the values of turbulent kinetic energy (k) and specific dissipation rate (omega).

Second: When the outlet boundary is set as Pressure outlet, do I need to change the Turbulence specification for outlet boundary into "k + Omega" as long as "Intensity + Length scale" or I just left it as "Intensity + Viscosity ratio"?

Thanks for any helps!

Trieu.
Email: trieuckgt@gmail.com
MSN: trieu.dut@live.com
YM: trieu_tme@yahoo.com
nvtrieu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2010, 03:54
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 18
Maddin is on a distinguished road
Initial conditions? Velocity = 0? and inlet with 90+ m/s?
Drink some beer and think about that.
Maddin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2010, 03:58
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 17
nvtrieu is on a distinguished road
Hi Maddin,

Initial velocity=Inlet velocity.
I've solved for this problem.

Thanks!
nvtrieu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2010, 06:05
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 18
Maddin is on a distinguished road
Ok! What was the problem?
Maddin is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
multiphaseInterFoam for RAS turbulence model chiven OpenFOAM Bugs 8 December 6, 2017 03:08
Huge Heat Transfer Coefficient with SST turbulence model andoss CFX 4 January 9, 2010 08:40
Understanding k-omega SST model source code tmhonka OpenFOAM Programming & Development 1 September 8, 2009 08:33
SST transitional turbulence model Ben Akih CFX 3 June 8, 2006 16:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35.