|
[Sponsors] |
Simulation is stuck in “re-partitioning” step in HPC |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 22, 2023, 01:08 |
Simulation is stuck in “re-partitioning” step in HPC
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 |
it's a simulation with 886w overset mesh and 253 bg mesh applying adaptive overset mesh refinement with 378 cores running.
when it ran about 4 hours in hpc, the output file is stuck in “re-partitioning” and no longer updates, even though the is running normally. If i kill it and restart it again, it also will stuck in about 4 hours. what will cause this occur ? plz. this is normal output: TimeStep 8000: Time 1.560000e+00 40000 2.349517e+08 7.078061e+07 1.365317e+09 7.956696e+07 4.532384e+09 1.456996e+07 1.346901e-04 Mesh of the region bgFixed adapted. Removing 12360 vertices from region bgFixed (11850 primaries) Mesh of the region ov adapted. Removing 17 vertices from region ov (13 primaries) OVM 1 needs update Updating two-level indirect region interface OVM1 between ov and bgFixed. Re-partitioning Initialization of star.segregatedflow.SegregatedFlowModel requires an additional pass... Initialization of star.segregatedflow.SegregatedFlowSolver requires an additional pass... Initialization of star.segregatedenergy.SegregatedFluidTemperatureMo del requires an additional pass... Initialization of star.segregatedenergy.SegregatedEnergySolver requires an additional pass... OVM 1 needs update Updating two-level indirect region interface OVM 1 between ov and bgFixed. 40001 9.198809e+09 2.546202e+11 4.165964e+12 1.944885e+11 1.591007e+11 4.361700e+09 3.033863e-02 however, the output stuck at: Re-partitioning and there is no "Initialization of star.segregatedflow.SegregatedFlowModel..." and so on. Last edited by Kissshot; July 22, 2023 at 01:29. Reason: add running cores |
|
July 22, 2023, 12:07 |
|
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
|
||
July 23, 2023, 05:08 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 |
Quote:
I will create a Maximum memory report and monitor to check memory consumption. |
||
July 24, 2023, 10:25 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
TheIndianLel
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
|
||
July 24, 2023, 21:39 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 |
Quote:
Is there any method to prevent memory comsumption from increasing to maximum value? For example, free the memory periodically? Thank you in advance. |
||
July 24, 2023, 22:14 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 |
||
July 25, 2023, 08:14 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 7 |
You'll need to share more details about your case and the cluster for us to be able to help further. What is the cell count and the reported memory consumption at start of the simulation and at the point when it freezes? How many HPC nodes do you use and what is the RAM installed on each of them?
|
|
July 29, 2023, 09:35 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
TheIndianLel
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
Another reason my meshes were crashing eventhough there was enough memory was because of my mpi version (I made sure star-ccm+ has access to more memory than it requires). This might not be useful to you but if someone comes across this thread with a similar issue, it might be helpful for them. |
||
Tags |
hpc, simulation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[solidMechanics] Support thread for "Solid Mechanics Solvers added to OpenFOAM Extend" | bigphil | OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction | 686 | December 22, 2022 10:10 |
Floating point exception error | lpz_michele | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 53 | October 19, 2015 03:50 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |
Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 19:07 |
Backward-facing step simulation | Keith | Main CFD Forum | 3 | December 17, 2003 02:14 |