CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Simulation is stuck in “re-partitioning” step in HPC

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 22, 2023, 01:08
Question Simulation is stuck in “re-partitioning” step in HPC
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
Kissshot is on a distinguished road
it's a simulation with 886w overset mesh and 253 bg mesh applying adaptive overset mesh refinement with 378 cores running.
when it ran about 4 hours in hpc, the output file is stuck in “re-partitioning” and no longer updates, even though the is running normally. If i kill it and restart it again, it also will stuck in about 4 hours.
what will cause this occur ? plz.

this is normal output:
TimeStep 8000: Time 1.560000e+00
40000 2.349517e+08 7.078061e+07 1.365317e+09 7.956696e+07 4.532384e+09 1.456996e+07 1.346901e-04
Mesh of the region bgFixed adapted.
Removing 12360 vertices from region bgFixed (11850 primaries)
Mesh of the region ov adapted.
Removing 17 vertices from region ov (13 primaries)
OVM 1 needs update

Updating two-level indirect region interface OVM1 between ov and bgFixed.

Re-partitioning
Initialization of star.segregatedflow.SegregatedFlowModel requires an additional pass...
Initialization of star.segregatedflow.SegregatedFlowSolver requires an additional pass...
Initialization of star.segregatedenergy.SegregatedFluidTemperatureMo del requires an additional pass...
Initialization of star.segregatedenergy.SegregatedEnergySolver requires an additional pass...
OVM 1 needs update

Updating two-level indirect region interface OVM 1 between ov and bgFixed.

40001 9.198809e+09 2.546202e+11 4.165964e+12 1.944885e+11 1.591007e+11 4.361700e+09 3.033863e-02

however, the output stuck at:
Re-partitioning

and there is no "Initialization of star.segregatedflow.SegregatedFlowModel..." and so on.

Last edited by Kissshot; July 22, 2023 at 01:29. Reason: add running cores
Kissshot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 22, 2023, 12:07
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 7
FliegenderZirkus is on a distinguished road
Quote:
output file is stuck in “re-partitioning” and no longer updates, even though the is running normally
What makes you think that the simulation is running normally? Isn't it stuck? I doubt it's just the output file not updating. It can be many things but one of the first ones I'd check is memory consumption. It may be that your mesh adaptation creates so many cells that the sim no longer fits into memory. This can be checked by a Maximum memory report and monitor in Star-CCM+.
FliegenderZirkus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2023, 05:08
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
Kissshot is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FliegenderZirkus View Post
What makes you think that the simulation is running normally? Isn't it stuck? I doubt it's just the output file not updating. It can be many things but one of the first ones I'd check is memory consumption. It may be that your mesh adaptation creates so many cells that the sim no longer fits into memory. This can be checked by a Maximum memory report and monitor in Star-CCM+.
Thanks a lot for your advice.
I will create a Maximum memory report and monitor to check memory consumption.
Kissshot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2023, 10:25
Default
  #4
New Member
 
TheIndianLel
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
theindianlel is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FliegenderZirkus View Post
What makes you think that the simulation is running normally? Isn't it stuck? I doubt it's just the output file not updating. It can be many things but one of the first ones I'd check is memory consumption. It may be that your mesh adaptation creates so many cells that the sim no longer fits into memory. This can be checked by a Maximum memory report and monitor in Star-CCM+.
Yeah, this could be the case. I had a similar experience recently when generating a mesh with large number of cells.
theindianlel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2023, 21:39
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
Kissshot is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FliegenderZirkus View Post
What makes you think that the simulation is running normally? Isn't it stuck? I doubt it's just the output file not updating. It can be many things but one of the first ones I'd check is memory consumption. It may be that your mesh adaptation creates so many cells that the sim no longer fits into memory. This can be checked by a Maximum memory report and monitor in Star-CCM+.
I checked memory consumption. It increases to maximum memory of hpc as simulation runs, then the simulation stuck.
Is there any method to prevent memory comsumption from increasing to maximum value? For example, free the memory periodically?
Thank you in advance.
Kissshot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2023, 22:14
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
Kissshot is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by theindianlel View Post
Yeah, this could be the case. I had a similar experience recently when generating a mesh with large number of cells.
yes, the memory matters a lot. But, i think the memory should fluctuate around an average value, not keep increasing.
Kissshot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2023, 08:14
Default
  #7
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 7
FliegenderZirkus is on a distinguished road
You'll need to share more details about your case and the cluster for us to be able to help further. What is the cell count and the reported memory consumption at start of the simulation and at the point when it freezes? How many HPC nodes do you use and what is the RAM installed on each of them?
FliegenderZirkus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 29, 2023, 09:35
Default
  #8
New Member
 
TheIndianLel
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
theindianlel is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kissshot View Post
yes, the memory matters a lot. But, i think the memory should fluctuate around an average value, not keep increasing.
Yes. At one point the memory requirement keeps increasing until it reaches a maximum. I tracked the memory usage when some of my meshes were crashing. They crashed because of lack of memory. I am not aware of the entire meshing algorithm to tell you at what point this happens, though.

Another reason my meshes were crashing eventhough there was enough memory was because of my mpi version (I made sure star-ccm+ has access to more memory than it requires). This might not be useful to you but if someone comes across this thread with a similar issue, it might be helpful for them.
theindianlel is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
hpc, simulation


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[solidMechanics] Support thread for "Solid Mechanics Solvers added to OpenFOAM Extend" bigphil OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction 686 December 22, 2022 10:10
Floating point exception error lpz_michele OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 53 October 19, 2015 03:50
IcoFoam parallel woes msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 03:58
Could anybody help me see this error and give help liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07
Backward-facing step simulation Keith Main CFD Forum 3 December 17, 2003 02:14


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43.