|
[Sponsors] |
December 17, 2022, 18:46 |
Automated mesh with linear pattern
|
#1 |
New Member
Boaz Vipulananthan
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
I am trying to simulate a battery pack cooling system for an fsae vehicle. I have managed to use the built in battery models to simulate the cells. Current is drawn from the cells, generating heat. This is simulated using a user-define 0D RCR equivalent circuit model. Cooler air flows over the cells, cooling the cells down. A test module contains 18 cells. Simulating all of these cells individually uses up a lot of computer resources. The cells will all be under the exact same load, and will therefore produce the same amount of heat. I created the mesh for a single cell, then used a mesh pattern for the other cells. To do this, the first cell needs to have a mesh created before using the pattern. However, I also need to create a conformal mesh between the cells and the air to get the best heat transfer results. To do this, all parts need to be within the same automated mesh. I don't know how to both create a conformal mesh and use the mesh pattern. The aim is to reduce the time taken to get results for the same mesh size and other settings. I have attached an image just to show the current arrangement of the cells. Any help is appreciated. v13 6x3 Module Simulation_Temperature - Surface upload.jpg v13 6x3 Module Simulation_Temperature - Planes upload.jpg |
|
December 17, 2022, 19:23 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Boaz Vipulananthan
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
I thought I would try to test whether the software is calculating the heat generated for each cell separately.
I ran a simulation with a single cell, and then again with 5 cells. All other factors were kept the same, and the simulation completed in nearly the same amount of time (within 5% difference). So the software isn't simulating the repeated cells separately. This thread can be closed, although I am not sure how to do that, sorry. |
|
December 19, 2022, 03:50 |
|
#3 |
Member
Marc Ricart
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 4 |
Hello,
I have never used the pattern function but a couple of things come to mind they can help you. 1) do you need to simulate the 18 cells exactly? I would be very tempted to split the model in 2 and use a symmetry plane to simulate just half the model. 2) Maybe you can start using a model of the cells only and adding a convection heat transfer on the surface and get a 1st estimate. Also, which hardware are you using? how many cells this model has? when you talk about "Simulating all of these cells individually uses up a lot of computer resources" what do you mean? takes 1 day to simulate? 1 week? do you have any acces to a University cluster? Edit: Oh, I see now that you are using the battery model of Star-CCM+. Is that maybe including extra calculations? maybe you can extract the heat generated for the cells in W first and the add that to the CFD model as a heat source and you avoid having all this models interconnected and working at the same time (which is nice but I am sure it complicates the model a lot and maybe not needed right now) Last edited by cramr5; December 19, 2022 at 03:52. Reason: new information |
|
December 20, 2022, 15:45 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Chaotic Water
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Elgrin Fau
Posts: 438
Rep Power: 18 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
Fail to converge when solving with a fabricated solution | zizhou | FLUENT | 0 | March 22, 2021 07:33 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh stuck when snap is turned on | yukuns | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | February 2, 2021 14:05 |
Converting Starccm+ mesh | Ladnam | OpenFOAM | 0 | September 14, 2011 07:30 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |