|
[Sponsors] |
Divergence when surpassing Mach 1 using simple grid (studying compressible effects) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 4, 2022, 08:45 |
Divergence when surpassing Mach 1 using simple grid (studying compressible effects)
|
#1 |
New Member
Federico Echeverrz Vega
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Münster, Deutschland
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4 |
Hi Everyone!
I´m currently writing my master's thesis about the behavior of a coolant (Novec 649) when passing through a passive grid inside a rectangular tunnel (3D sim). Bit of background: I designed 2 Domains: The first one is 4mmx4mmx215mm, a simple square grid is placed on z=15mm, its 1.5mm thick. The grid is composed of one horizontal bar 1.5mm thick, and another vertically with the same thickness. (See photo1 & 2). I´ve established that the velocity inlet is the plane at z=0. The walls are established as symmetry planes, the cross as a wall.. and the plane a z=215mm is an outlet. The second domain has the same attributes but now it has a full grid. The size is 50mmx25mmx215mm, the grid at z=15mm and 1.5mm thickness. (See photo2) Ive established the boundary conditions according to the experimental data we have. Pressure, Temperature, etc. My problem and I can´t seem to find a reason why is... why is it that my simulation using a single cross (domain1) converges (up to Initial of V=25m/s, beyond that we reach Mach 1 and the sim diverges) and the data is validated by our experiments... but for domain 2 using the *same* initial velocity the simulation diverges. For Domain 1 the max v_in that I can establish is 25m/s, however, for domain 2 the max that I can establish is V_in=13 m/s? Both of those numbers produce flows that reach Mach 0.9xxxxxx ... but the moment I input 1m/s more, we breach Mach 1 and the simulation automatically diverges. I´m using these settings: Mesh Type: Trimmed Cells # of Cells 30k+ for Full domain and Space: 3D Material: Gas -> NOVEC 649 Flow: Coupled Equation of State: Real Gas Real Gas Equation of State: Peng-Robinson Time: Steady Viscous Regime: Turbulent Reynolds Averaged turbulence: (K-Omega or Spalart Allmaras) For Boundary conditions I have: Static Temperature 375K Pressure: 281MPA Photos 2 & 6 correspond just to a preview of the geometry of both domains Photos 3&4 show an example of how 1m/s makes the sim Break the Mach 1 sim and thus creating divergnce Photo 8 is domain 2 (full size) cross view of the Mesh. Thanks a lot! |
|
Tags |
compressible flow problem, compressible model, mach number |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
On grid independent solution for pulsatile flow | David | FLUENT | 5 | March 25, 2022 04:33 |
Grid Independence problem for simple pipe geometry | chanchala | FLUENT | 13 | November 20, 2003 09:24 |
Combustion Convergence problems | Art Stretton | Phoenics | 5 | April 2, 2002 06:59 |
Grid Independent Solution | Chuck Leakeas | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 26, 2000 12:18 |
momentum under-relaxation for compressible flow with SIMPLE | Mihai ARGHIR | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 7, 2000 05:58 |