|
[Sponsors] |
January 7, 2022, 09:42 |
Prescribe velocity field as essential B.C.
|
#1 |
New Member
Michelle
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 4 |
Hi all,
I am new to star ccm+ so this is probably a stupid question. I have a cube and I want to prescribe the velocity on the cube faces to create a uniaxial extensional flow: velocity = [strain_rate*x,-strain_rate/2*y,-strain_rate/2*z]. So what I did is created a velocity_inlet boundary condition on the surfaces. Since the velocity depends on the local coordinates on the surfaces I thought it was best to define it via a field function, but I can not figure out how this works. I want to have a strain_rate of 1, but I don't know how to set a user variable. I tried to define a user field function but I keep getting syntax errors because the dimension is not right: [$$Position[1]*1, -0.5*$$Position[2],-0.5*$$Position[3]]. I also saw that there is a velocity field function, so I tried to add that to the boundary condition, but now I can't find how to define the velocity. Can anyone please help me out? Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Michelle |
|
January 8, 2022, 03:50 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
The velocity field function is a primitive function that you should never try to edit. That's your velocity solution when you iterate... You don't want to mess with it (you can't either how).
Use indexing 0, 1, and 2 for the x,y,and z components of a vector. Enclose variable names in curly brackets if they are fancy. I.e. ${strain_rate} if strain_rate is a defined scalar function. Single $ are for referencing scalar functions and dbl dollar signs $$ are for referencing vectors. Note that you could also define parameters that can be referenced in field functions rather than creating an entire field function for a simple constant value. What is wrong with? Code:
[$${Position}[0]*1, -0.5*$${Position}[1],-0.5*$${Position}[2]] Last edited by LuckyTran; January 8, 2022 at 12:54. |
|
January 8, 2022, 07:16 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Michelle
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 4 |
Thank you for your answer!
The problem with that line was that it has the wrong dimensions. It gives as result the unit of Position and not Velocity. If I want to define a scalar Strain_rate [1/s] do I have to do that via a field function as well, or is there an easier way? Thanks! Michelle |
|
January 8, 2022, 12:53 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
Easy? There's no such thing as a free lunch.
If cowabunga has a value of 1 then why not just hard code it as-is? If you plan on changing its value later one day to 189 and on another day to -256, then I recommend to use a parameter. You can find parameters in the tree in tools if you look a little further down past field functions. If cowabunga is spatially/temporally varying field, then use a field function. Units are units. Just take care of them. If you define dimensionless stuff and try to use it as an input to dimensioned things, Star will assume SI units for the dimensionless stuff. If you define dimensions, then you are in charge of making sure the dimensions match. Position obviously has units of length. 1, and -0.5 has units of no-dimensions. Instead of 1, which has no units, type 1 [1/s] |
|
January 8, 2022, 16:09 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Michelle
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 4 |
Thank you I will try that!
|
|
Tags |
field function, prescribed velocity |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Import .csv - velocity profile - error | eSKa | CFX | 9 | April 3, 2021 14:38 |
Same pressure gradient but different velocity field | TurbJet | Main CFD Forum | 22 | April 28, 2018 04:35 |
potential flows, helmholtz decomposition and other stuffs | pigna | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 26, 2017 09:34 |
velocity field of MRF, GGI and rotatingWallVelocity | tonky | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | October 14, 2016 12:04 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |