CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Diverge issue

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 23, 2019, 21:23
Exclamation Diverge issue
  #1
New Member
 
Ian
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 7
cgswjs is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,
I’m new to star-ccm+ and I really need someone to help me at this point. After watching tutorials on YouTube and reading materials from google, I figured out most of my project and I got a good residual plot until something happened at interaction 250. Here’s what I’ve done: I repaired surface and there’s no piercing. I set up auto mesh and surface control all different regions. I did mesh diagnostic and removed bad cells. Cell quality remediation was turned on as well. My project is a double piped heat exchanger with hot water in the inner tube and cold air in the annulus. I set velocity inlet for annulus air and mass flow inlet for tube water. Both outlets were set to pressure outlet. I got a nice temperature and velocity contour before residual went sky high. After iteration 250, the residual went up to 1e4 and I stopped the algorithm. Can someone help me identify the problem here? I’ve tried lower the URF but it didn’t seem to work. I really don’t know what else to do. Btw, advancing prism layer mesh was used for both fluid regions and I assumed the boundary layer thickness was 1mm.
cgswjs is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2019, 21:53
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 8
Nadaaaa22 is on a distinguished road
I don’t have many knowledge in the software, for the mesh you can use mesh sensitivity to assure that your mesh is ok. For the divergent it may due the back flow. If you have a fluid domain you may try to make it larger I don’t know if this would be helpful.
Nadaaaa22 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2019, 22:07
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Ian
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 7
cgswjs is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nadaaaa22 View Post
I don’t have many knowledge in the software, for the mesh you can use mesh sensitivity to assure that your mesh is ok. For the divergent it may due the back flow. If you have a fluid domain you may try to make it larger I don’t know if this would be helpful.
Yes I think it caused by reversed flow since at interation 251 it appeared a lot reversed flow in air. How can I fix this reversed flow issue without changing the geometry? What do you mean by make it larger? Since I need to verify this CFD model with an experiment set up, I can't just change the model.
cgswjs is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2019, 05:26
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 8
Nadaaaa22 is on a distinguished road
How did you add the fluid domain of air?.
Nadaaaa22 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2019, 06:40
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Ian
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 7
cgswjs is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nadaaaa22 View Post
How did you add the fluid domain of air?.
Create a fluid continua and in region property tab assign it to the region
cgswjs is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2019, 02:37
Default
  #6
Member
 
Steve
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: South Korea
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 8
steve lee is on a distinguished road
Diverge problem is quite complecated.. It is very hard to give you any advice about this kind of thread. Sometime mesh problem is right, but sometimes are not.

Check what factor diverged in your residual first
steve lee is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2019, 14:11
Default Suggestion
  #7
RKE
New Member
 
RKE
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 14
RKE is on a distinguished road
Good Morning!

The description you provide suggests to me that your problem may be due to numerical instability occurring at some point where the velocity field changes rapidly (say at a turn, flowing past a baffle, etc.). That has happened to me when modeling agitator blades as the pass in front of a baffle in a stirred tank.

I have been able to correct that by specifying relaxation factor ramps (i. e., progressively changing relaxation factors) for the various solvers.

Maybe some variation of these adjusments could be of help to you.
Attached Files
File Type: doc Screenshot.doc (143.5 KB, 7 views)
RKE is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2019, 18:02
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Ian
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 7
cgswjs is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKE View Post
Good Morning!

The description you provide suggests to me that your problem may be due to numerical instability occurring at some point where the velocity field changes rapidly (say at a turn, flowing past a baffle, etc.). That has happened to me when modeling agitator blades as the pass in front of a baffle in a stirred tank.

I have been able to correct that by specifying relaxation factor ramps (i. e., progressively changing relaxation factors) for the various solvers.

Maybe some variation of these adjusments could be of help to you.
I'm using stead solver right now and yes I have 6 turbulent generators in my annulus region so I guess it could be the problem. Do you suggest me to use implicit solver?
cgswjs is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2019, 20:22
Default Suggestion
  #9
RKE
New Member
 
RKE
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 14
RKE is on a distinguished road
Yes, I suggest using under-relaxation in the solvers. The system provides some initial ramp settings to try first.
RKE is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
residual


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Issue on zeroGradient BC for system rotation magnushaese OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 January 28, 2022 14:43
rhoCentralFoam inviscid airfoil issue (Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??) kmkb21 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 March 1, 2018 02:07
Prism Layer - Core Mesh Boundary Issue InfernoxCJC STAR-CCM+ 7 November 21, 2017 16:46
foamToTecplot360 issue with multiregion solvers manuc OpenFOAM Post-Processing 2 November 21, 2016 14:51
Pressure boundary condition issue Vijay FLUENT 0 April 6, 2012 14:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:10.