|
[Sponsors] |
November 14, 2018, 06:24 |
Two stroke exhaust simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
Juanjo Garcia
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello everyone,
I am trying to set-up a transient simulation of a two stroke engine in Star CCM+ to see the pressure wave created. The geometry of the exhaust is similar to the one shown in the following link. https://www.diymotofix.com/blog/how-...t-system-works My models are: - Implicit Unsteady - Segregated Fluid Entalphy - Turbulent (k-epsilon) - Ideal gas - Three dimensional My boundary conditions are: - Inlet: mass flow inlet (0.01 kg/s at 700K) - Outlet: pressure outlet (0.0 Pa) Moreover, the inlet boundary conditions are pulse inputs, simulating the opening of the exhaust valve during 0.001s. To do so, I have created field functions with the following sintaxis: ($Time > 0.001s) ? 0 : value (where value depends on the field, i.e. temperature or mass flow). The simulation runs without problem, but when looking at results, the temperature has a strange behaviour. The temperature is at 700K in the inlet, but it quickly decreases to ambient temperature at a short distance of the input, as shown in the figure below. Captura de pantalla (244).jpg So, my question is, do I need to change any other parameters? Thank you |
|
November 14, 2018, 17:36 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
André
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10 |
What are the boundary conditions of the walls? Also if this is a transient simulation, what are your initial conditions? Probably you are starting with the entire domain at 300K which may or may not be what you are looking for.
__________________
Sapere aude! |
|
November 14, 2018, 18:33 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Juanjo Garcia
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10 |
Thank you for your reply.
For the wall, I tried adiabatic, which is the default option. Aftee that, I also tried Heat Flux and Temperature, with similar results. Initially, the domain is at 300K, ambient temperature, but this temperature should not disipate the flow temperature so quick, right? I was wondering if the problem cames because the domain is full of the same air at lower temperature, which rapidily disipates the exhaust gas. Maybe I can set-up a simulation with different gases or start the simulation with the domain wmpty of air, but I don't know if it is possible. Any ideas? |
|
November 14, 2018, 18:58 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
André
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10 |
Well depends on how long you ran the simulation. I think it would be OK to either start at 300K and let it run for a while, or perhaps start at a higher gas temperature which would mean the exhaust is already heated up and would take less time to reach a "steady-state" condition.
__________________
Sapere aude! |
|
Tags |
boundary conditions, exhaust, star ccm, two stroke |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Heat transfer simulation of exhaust manifold | Phili | CFX | 30 | June 12, 2014 03:40 |
exhaust manifold flow and heat transfer simulation | jai | CFX | 4 | September 6, 2013 16:52 |
AVL fire Exhaust manifold Simulation | mohsenfjs | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 15, 2010 12:51 |
4 stroke engine inlet/exhaust simulation | flo777 | CFX | 3 | March 16, 2010 17:44 |
exhaust gas simulation | jai | CFX | 1 | November 23, 2009 05:23 |