|
[Sponsors] |
October 9, 2018, 06:16 |
STARCCM Helicity nomenclature
|
#1 |
Member
Bineet Mehra
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello,
The sign convention for helicity or vorticity is +ve for a anti clockwise circulation and vice versa. But in starCCM it shows to be opposite. A +ve helicity is associatd with a clockwise vortex and a -ve helicity is associated with an anticlockwise vortex. Any inputs on this ? Something here is wrong? Thanks Bineet |
|
October 9, 2018, 11:50 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
I've always thought right-hand rule applies and +ve is clockwise.
edit* hahaha I guess it depends which orientation you are looking from whether it is clockwise or anti-clockwise. |
|
October 9, 2018, 11:52 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
Right hand rule applies no?
|
|
October 9, 2018, 12:05 |
|
#4 |
Member
Bineet Mehra
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 13 |
this is the reply i got from STARCCM official forum
"Note that there is no sign convention involved for both quantities since they are precise defined: vorticity = w = curl of velocity field helicity = h = v.w (scalar product)" |
|
October 9, 2018, 12:19 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
That's quite a non-sense response from the Star crew because vorticity is a vector that characterizes a rotation. It is precisely defined as such, having a length and direction, but the direction of that vector is linked to the direction of rotation via the right-hand rule.
Maybe you can go back and ask them what happens when the magnitude of a vector is negative, which way it points? That is a cop-out answer to say "the precise definition is here," also not helpful to somehow like you who has a legitimate question. Are they going to say there's no sign convention for vector direction because vectors always point in the positive direction? Honestly, I'm shaking my head. |
|
October 9, 2018, 12:55 |
|
#6 |
Member
Bineet Mehra
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks a lot for your input. I am going to supply them some contours and streamlines for a detailed explanation. Will let you know.
Regards |
|
October 10, 2018, 03:40 |
|
#7 |
Member
Bineet Mehra
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello
I think its all ok. I got confused from the reply of STARCCM. Please find attached two images for a better interpretation. Image 1 is the channel geometry with a pair of vortex generators (Main flow is along x axis, u = some value, v=w=0). Image 2 shows the streamline and contours of helicity at some streamwise cross sectional plane shown in image 1 (+ve x axis in image 2 is into the plane of the paper away from the reader). Looking at image 2 from +ve x axis we see an anticlockwise vortex (right side one z >0). For this vortex, vorticity or helicity should have a +ve sign according to right hand thumb rule which is actually the case in helicity plot for the right side vortex. So its ok i guess. But i did not understand when starCCM said there is no sign convention for vorticity in STARCCM. Regards Bineet |
|
Tags |
helicity, star ccm+, vorticity |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Helicity - Relative Helicity in CFX Post | simulationCFX | CFX | 3 | December 25, 2010 05:10 |
Meshing for StarCCM | sjohnson | Main CFD Forum | 2 | June 3, 2010 09:10 |
importing cad geometry, starCCM 64bit?? | syd | STAR-CCM+ | 3 | March 30, 2010 08:17 |
[Other] Problems with starccm mesh | AndTen | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | February 23, 2010 05:43 |
Importing new design in starCCM | bramv101 | STAR-CCM+ | 0 | October 1, 2009 09:43 |